Real World Speed
Performance profile from 335,227 user samples
289,187 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 3721)
Worst Bench: 48% Device(7377 0000) 3GB
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 58th / 621
46,040 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% Gigabyte(1458 22D7)
Worst Bench: 35% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 35% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 70th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
52.4 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
43.5 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
192 fps 224 fps Better texture detail.
+17%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+13%
131 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
196 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+24%
158 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
154 fps Faster complex splatting.
+29%
119 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
216 fps 263 fps Better peak texture detail.
+22%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
156 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+14%
137 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
210 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+15%
183 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
168 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+33%
126 fps
CSGO
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
150 fps Slightly Better CSGO fps.
+8%
139 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+18%
83 fps
PUBG
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65 fps Slightly Better PUBG fps.
+13%
57 fps
GTAV
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60 fps Better GTAV fps.
+22%
49 fps
LoL
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
148 fps Slightly Better LoL fps.
+10%
134 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
100 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+13%
88 fps
BF1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55 fps Slightly Better BF1 fps.
+12%
49 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
51 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+5%
48 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
206 fps Hugely Better Minecraft fps.
+89%
109 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
115 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+20%
96 fps
WoW
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60 fps Better WoW fps.
+22%
50 fps
WoT
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps Better WoT fps.
+15%
82 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,908,976 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.85 % Hugely higher market share.
+414%
0.36 %
Value
Value For Money
73.1 % 82.2 % Slightly better value.
+12%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
101 % Slightly more popular.
+12%
90 %
Price
Price (score)
$170 $126 Cheaper.
+26%
Age
Newest
38 Months 38 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
220 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+15%
191 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
189 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+10%
172 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
203 fps Better lighting effects.
+28%
158 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
175 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+7%
164 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $73
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback