Real World Speed
Performance profile from 190,431 user samples
163,359 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Gigabyte(1458 3724)
Worst Bench: 58% EVGA(3842 6162)
Poor: 58% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 40th / 597
27,072 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 40% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 40% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 51st / 597
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66.1 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
55.6 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
190 fps 219 fps Better texture detail.
+15%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
146 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+12%
130 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
194 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+28%
151 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
153 fps Faster complex splatting.
+29%
119 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
216 fps 265 fps Better peak texture detail.
+23%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
161 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+16%
139 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
211 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+21%
175 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
169 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+33%
127 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
154 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+10%
140 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+25%
48 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+19%
55 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+6%
88 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+11%
144 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+14%
87 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+11%
49 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50 fps +3% 49 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
123 fps Better DOTA 2 fps.
+25%
99 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+21%
49 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91 fps 93 fps +3%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+6%
77 fps
Market Share
Based on 12,184,351 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.54 % Hugely higher market share.
+694%
0.32 %
Value
Value For Money
108 % Much better value.
+33%
81.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
96 % 103 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
Price
Price (score)
$175 Cheaper.
+16%
$208
Age
Newest
27 Months 27 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
222 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+15%
193 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
190 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
175 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
200 fps Much better lighting effects.
+34%
149 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
174 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+8%
161 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $340Nvidia GTX 1070 $340Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $77
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
Intel Core i5-8600K $240Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $799Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback