COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD
AMD
▲ 563,988 ▼

Release date: Q2 2017.

VS
Effective Speed 
+346%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 315,646 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
60,738 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 25% XFX(1682 9560) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 19% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 19% Great: 25%
SPEED RANK: 199th / 713
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		22 % 98.3 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+346%
Average Score 
+359%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		26.9 fps 124 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+361%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		28.1 fps 139 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+395%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		27.1 fps 118 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+335%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		31.4 fps 140 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+346%
Overclocked Score 
+342%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		30.8 fps 133 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+332%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		30 fps 146 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+387%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		28.8 fps 122 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+324%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		35.6 fps 151 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+324%
Game FPS 
+127%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		110 Fps 242 Fps Hugely Better CSGO Fps.
+121%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		52 Fps 167 Fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+219%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		50 Fps 117 Fps Hugely Better GTAV Fps.
+137%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		121 Fps 225 Fps Hugely Better LoL Fps.
+86%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		123 Fps 215 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+75%
Value & Sentiment 
+333%
Market Share
Based on 68,776,627 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.05 % 0.32 % Hugely higher market share.
+540%
Value
Value For Money 		10.4 % 87.6 % Hugely better value.
+739%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		56 % 59 % Slightly more popular.
+5%
Price
Price (score) 		$500 $266 Much cheaper.
+47%
Nice To Haves 
+292%
Age
Newest 		90 Months 64 Months More recent.
+29%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		42.4 fps 229 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+440%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		27.3 fps 98.2 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+260%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		37.8 fps 205 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+442%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		24.2 fps 94.3 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+290%
Conclusion 
Average Bench 22%
Average Bench 98.3%

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
60,738
254,908
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback