CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
229 EFps 232 EFps +1%
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Hugely Better GTAV EFps.
+93%
57 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+100%
69 EFps
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
127 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+92%
66 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
157 EFps Hugely Better Fortnite EFps.
+94%
81 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 206,909 user samples
63,638 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% PowerColor(148C 2398)
Worst Bench: 98% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Poor: 98% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 635
143,271 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Asus(1043 04FB)
Worst Bench: 43% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 43% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 67th / 635
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
106 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+105%
51.8 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
390 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+122%
176 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
238 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+71%
139 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
400 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+112%
189 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
441 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+108%
212 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
246 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+67%
147 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
427 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+100%
213 fps
Market Share
Based on 23,836,827 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.08 % Hugely higher market share.
+230%
0.63 %
Value
Value For Money
61.7 % 65.3 % Slightly better value.
+6%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
123 % More popular.
+28%
96 %
Price
Price (score)
$407 $188 Much cheaper.
+54%
Age
Newest
6 Months Hugely more recent.
+86%
43 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
309 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+70%
182 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
867 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+189%
300 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
378 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+186%
132 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
292 fps Much better reflection handling.
+72%
170 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
776 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+200%
259 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
363 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+188%
126 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition to better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback