CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
244 EFps 270 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+11%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
130 EFps Hugely Better GTAV EFps.
+103%
64 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
224 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+164%
85 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
170 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+115%
79 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
194 EFps Hugely Better Fortnite EFps.
+111%
92 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 142,257 user samples
20,197 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 178% PowerColor(148C 2406) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 165% XFX(1EAE 6701) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 165% Great: 178%
SPEED RANK: 21st / 714
122,060 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% PowerColor(148C 2391)
Worst Bench: 51% MSI(1462 C411)
Poor: 51% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 117th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
171 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+200%
56.9 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
202 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+181%
71.8 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
237 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+248%
68.1 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
377 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+457%
67.7 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
164 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+101%
81.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+169%
79.8 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
252 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+257%
70.5 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
397 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+457%
71.3 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
173 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+92%
90.3 fps
Market Share
Based on 67,477,005 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.16 % Much higher market share.
+33%
0.12 %
Value
Value For Money
62.3 % 67.4 % Slightly better value.
+8%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
58 % 77 % Much more popular.
+33%
Price
Price (score)
$650 $200 Much cheaper.
+69%
Age
Newest
41 Months Much more recent.
+37%
65 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
447 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+303%
111 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
331 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+513%
54 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
421 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+321%
99.9 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
310 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+488%
52.7 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 6800-XT delivers a huge generational jump in performance. AMD have upgraded the single fan cooler to a more efficient triple fan solution, perhaps indicating a shift in focus from benchmark busting headlines to user experience. Following the widespread issues that users faced with the 5000 and Vega series, we are cautiously optimistic that AMD have taken steps to ensure driver and hardware stability, this will need to be proven over time. The release of the 6000 series explains why Nvidia doubled performance per dollar when they released their 3070 just a few weeks ago. A comparison between Nvidia’s previous generation flagship, the 2080 Ti, and the 6800-XT shows that AMD now offer comparable raw performance at half the price. 16GB of VRAM is a key feature of the 6800 cards. At higher resolutions and detail settings, performance can bottleneck without sufficient GPU memory. AMD's marketers often cherry pick obscure games with high res/settings, the details of which are rarely disclosed, then compare the results with cards that have less memory. In that scenario, the cards with less memory look weaker than they would at 1080p. The 1080p results are sometimes omitted, or worse, partially omitted and frame drops are conveniently ignored. Most users will see little benefit in gaming at high resolutions. Without drastic price cuts (MSRP $650 USD) and miraculous marketing via countless promo videos and sponsored reviews, the 6800 XT will struggle to compete, partly because it lacks RTX+DLSS which is required for the best gaming experience in class leading titles such as Cyberpunk 2077. Users should be wary of AMD’s army of social media accounts, they aim to dupe shoppers any way they can. [Nov '20 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback