Real World Speed
Performance profile from 62,154 user samples
38,213 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 24th / 622
23,941 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Worst Bench: 53% Gigabyte(1458 2311) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 53% Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 48th / 622
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
92.7 % Much faster effective speed.
+53%
60.7 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
542 fps Much better texture detail.
+71%
317 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
188 fps Faster multi rendering.
+19%
158 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
370 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+59%
232 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
293 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+101%
146 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
628 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+74%
360 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
197 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+18%
167 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
423 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+64%
258 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
311 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+105%
152 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
223 fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+44%
154 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+31%
93 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
104 fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+51%
69 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
87 fps Better GTAV Fps.
+25%
70 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
188 fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+15%
164 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+18%
108 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
89 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+26%
70 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
214 fps +4% 205 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+32%
95 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,503,643 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.35 % 0.58 % Much higher market share.
+66%
Value
Value For Money
54.3 % 67.2 % Better value.
+24%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
107 % 113 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
Price
Price (score)
$405 $214 Much cheaper.
+47%
Age
Newest
26 Months 11 Months Much more recent.
+58%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
370 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+46%
254 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
247 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+16%
213 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
320 fps Much better lighting effects.
+42%
226 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
232 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+14%
203 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580 from 2016, which in turn was a refresh of their RX 480 (2015). This iteration yields 15% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is reflected in the early benchmark data. This increased performance is fuelled by an increased power draw: the 580 had a TDP of 185W compared to the 590’s 225W, which compares to 210W for AMD’s high-performance Radeon RX Vega 56. Like the 8GB version of the RX 580, the RX 590 also has 8GB of GDDR5 with a 256GB/s memory bandwidth. With this iteration there isn’t a 4GB variant which is a good thing because 4GB can bottleneck an increasing proportion of games. Priced at $280, it is currently 20% more expensive than NVIDIA’s popular 6GB 1060, but is 12% faster in terms of effective speed. As a bonus, shoppers can get better value for money by purchasing one of the numerous game bundles that are currently available. [Nov '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback