Real World Speed
Performance profile from 120,203 user samples
59,906 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 73% MSI(1462 3680)
Poor: 73% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 650
60,297 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% XFX(1682 9587)
Worst Bench: 53% ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 53% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 64th / 650
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
86.9 % Much faster effective speed.
+42%
61.2 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
334 fps Much better lighting effects.
+45%
230 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
188 fps Faster multi rendering.
+19%
158 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
373 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+62%
230 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
373 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+43%
260 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
198 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+19%
166 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
424 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+67%
254 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
223 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+28%
174 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+26%
96 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
104 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+55%
67 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+31%
67 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
194 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+14%
169 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
127 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+19%
107 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+26%
77 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 Fps +4% 84 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
202 Fps +4% 195 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
125 Fps Better WoT Fps.
+25%
100 Fps
Market Share
Based on 35,639,550 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.23 % 0.43 % Hugely higher market share.
+87%
Value
Value For Money
51.5 % 72.5 % Much better value.
+41%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
111 % 145 % Much more popular.
+31%
Price
Price (score)
$400 $200 Much cheaper.
+50%
Age
Newest
39 Months 24 Months Much more recent.
+38%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
245 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+14%
214 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
626 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+72%
363 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
310 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+105%
151 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
232 fps Better reflection handling.
+14%
203 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
547 fps Much better texture detail.
+73%
317 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
294 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+103%
145 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $144Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback