Real World Speed
Performance profile from 48,903 user samples
7,156 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 45% EVGA(3842 1151) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 38% Gigabyte(1458 3FCB)
Poor: 38% Great: 45%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 621
41,747 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% Asus(1043 04B0)
Worst Bench: 35% MSI(1462 3411)
Poor: 35% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 70th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
41.8 % 43.8 % +5%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
153 fps 225 fps Much better texture detail.
+47%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
93.4 fps 131 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+40%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
152 fps 159 fps +5%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
112 fps 120 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+7%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
171 fps 266 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+56%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
96 fps 138 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+44%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
160 fps 184 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+15%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
120 fps 126 fps +5%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps +4% 83 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,861,582 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.54 % Much higher market share.
+50%
0.36 %
Value
Value For Money
66 % 82.6 % Better value.
+25%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
113 % More popular.
+26%
90 %
Price
Price (score)
$150 $126 Cheaper.
+16%
Age
Newest
5 Months Hugely more recent.
+87%
38 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
190 fps 193 fps +2%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
148 fps 173 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+17%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
174 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+10%
158 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
140 fps 164 fps Better reflection handling.
+17%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback