Real World Speed
Performance profile from 810,181 user samples
658,138 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 50% Asus(1043 85B6)
Poor: 50% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 51st / 621
152,043 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% MSI(1462 3413)
Worst Bench: 41% Gigabyte(1458 22E7) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 41% Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 61st / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.3 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+13%
50 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
212 fps 258 fps Better texture detail.
+22%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+6%
140 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
209 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+12%
187 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
162 fps Faster complex splatting.
+29%
126 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
237 fps 299 fps Better peak texture detail.
+26%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
160 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
147 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
224 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+7%
210 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+33%
132 fps
CSGO
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps +3% 155 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
102 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+10%
93 fps
PUBG
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68 fps Better PUBG fps.
+17%
59 fps
GTAV
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60 fps Slightly Better GTAV fps.
+9%
55 fps
LoL
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
181 fps Slightly Better LoL fps.
+13%
160 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+7%
95 fps
BF1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70 fps 73 fps +4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
57 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+9%
53 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
217 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+37%
158 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
132 fps +4% 126 fps
WoW
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76 fps Slightly Better WoW fps.
+13%
68 fps
WoT
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
105 fps +4% 101 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,862,151 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
4.05 % Hugely higher market share.
+447%
0.74 %
Value
Value For Money
58 % 84.6 % Much better value.
+46%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
118 % More popular.
+19%
99 %
Price
Price (score)
$230 $140 Much cheaper.
+39%
Age
Newest
39 Months +2% 40 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
242 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+14%
213 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
209 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+15%
181 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
222 fps Better lighting effects.
+21%
184 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
196 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+15%
171 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback