Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,432,259 user samples
1,368,019 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% Gigabyte(1458 371D)
Worst Bench: 51% MSI(1462 3490) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 51% Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 119th / 713
64,240 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 22% Sapphire(174B E344)
Worst Bench: 17% Gigabyte(1458 22D6)
Poor: 17% Great: 22%
SPEED RANK: 218th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.1 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+184%
19.7 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
69.6 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+195%
23.6 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
76.8 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+178%
27.6 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.8 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+143%
27.1 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
70 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+159%
27 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
75.4 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+181%
26.8 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
109 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+276%
29 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
70.1 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+149%
28.2 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
74.9 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+146%
30.4 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
160 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+37%
117 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 Fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+97%
52 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
62 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+58%
39 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
178 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+58%
113 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 Fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+71%
59 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
70 Fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+62%
43 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
56 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+73%
32 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+121%
97 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
131 Fps Hugely Better DOTA 2 Fps.
+95%
67 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
105 Fps Hugely Better WoT Fps.
+126%
47 Fps
Market Share
Based on 68,744,764 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.15 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,483%
0.06 %
Value
Value For Money
114 % Hugely better value.
+83%
62.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
88 % Much more popular.
+52%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$117 $75 Much cheaper.
+36%
Age
Newest
100 Months 99 Months +1%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
73.3 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+96%
37.4 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
70.6 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+167%
26.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
66.9 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+105%
32.7 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
65.7 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+188%
22.8 fps

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card provided prices settle appropriately. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback