Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 370,600 user samples
111,509 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 28% EVGA(3842 2957)
Worst Bench: 22% Zotac(19DA 1376)
Poor: 22% Great: 28%
SPEED RANK: 189th / 713
259,091 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 46% MSI(1462 3870) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 39% Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 39% Great: 46%
SPEED RANK: 142nd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
25.6 % 42.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+68%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
31.6 fps 54.7 fps Much better lighting effects.
+73%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
37.5 fps 58.1 fps Much better reflection handling.
+55%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
34.2 fps 51.6 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+51%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
31.4 fps 50 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+59%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
35.9 fps 58.9 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+64%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
45.8 fps 77.6 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+69%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
36.3 fps 64.8 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+79%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
34.6 fps 53.2 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+54%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
122 Fps 148 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+21%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
50 Fps 91 Fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+84%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
119 Fps 119 Fps +0%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 Fps 134 Fps +1%
Market Share
Based on 68,727,290 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.06 % 0.93 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,450%
Value
Value For Money
60.6 % 67 % Better value.
+11%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
59 % 79 % Much more popular.
+34%
Price
Price (score)
$100 Much cheaper.
+34%
$152
Age
Newest
111 Months 66 Months Much more recent.
+41%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
32.7 fps 54.2 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+66%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
30.9 fps 48.3 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+56%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
29.6 fps 49.3 fps Much better texture detail.
+67%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
28.1 fps 44.7 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+59%

The GTX 950 is Nvidia's latest Maxwell card which is based on a GTX 960 but with 25% fewer CUDA cores and 25% fewer texture units. Comparing the GTX 960 and 950 shows that, as expected, effective speed has been reduced by 25%. The GTX 950 is positioned above GTX 750 Ti which is Nvidia's energy efficient mass market GPU. Comparing the 750 Ti and 950 shows that 950 is nearly 50% faster but it's also priced 50% higher so the 950 doesn't offer improved value for money. Gaming performance for the GTX 950 at resolutions up to 1080p on high/ultra settings will be satisfactory most of the time. That said, the GTX 950 is priced on the high side ($160). At present the GTX 960 ($171) offers 25% better performance for just 7% more money. See a current list of the best value graphics cards here[Aug '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback