CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
280 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+17%
240 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+28%
86 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+39%
99 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
135 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+45%
93 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
133 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+11%
120 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 266,982 user samples
129,308 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 107% Nvidia(10DE 13A2) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 90% MSI(1462 C752)
Poor: 90% Great: 107%
SPEED RANK: 24th / 643
137,674 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 80% Zotac(19DA 4527) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 67% HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 80%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 643
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
99 % Much faster effective speed.
+34%
74.1 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
362 fps Better lighting effects.
+23%
294 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
363 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+65%
220 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
331 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+26%
262 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
409 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+27%
323 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
389 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+57%
248 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
360 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+28%
281 fps
Market Share
Based on 33,341,307 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.78 % Much higher market share.
+48%
1.2 %
Value
Value For Money
55.8 % 65.2 % Better value.
+17%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
160 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
147 %
Price
Price (score)
$420 $269 Much cheaper.
+36%
Age
Newest
14 Months More recent.
+26%
19 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
334 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+31%
255 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
458 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+50%
306 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
246 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+28%
192 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
304 fps Better reflection handling.
+30%
234 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
394 fps Much better texture detail.
+46%
270 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
224 fps Faster complex splatting.
+27%
176 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Nvidia’s RTX 2060 Super GPU is a refreshed version of their RTX 2060 launched just 10 months prior. With this iteration, NVIDIA are hoping to contest AMD’s recent RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT with a better value proposition than compared to the 2060. The RTX 2060 Super uses the same GPU die as in the 2060, but has extra CUDA cores (increasing from 1920 to 2176) and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory (up from 6 GB), capable of delivering 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It has a has a TDP of 175 W, compared to 160 W in the 2060. The RTX 2060S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 15-20% increase in effective speed from the 2060 to 2060 Super costs around $50 on reference price tags. For now Nvidia will retain the "not-Super" RTX 2060 as the most affordable GPU in the ray-tracing 2000 series at $350 USD. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback