Real World Speed
Performance profile from 57,940 user samples
38,162 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 67% EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 621
19,778 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% PowerColor(148C 2391) ≥ 4GB; Red Devil
Worst Bench: 51% XFX(1682 9587)
Poor: 51% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 47th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
73.8 % Faster effective speed.
+22%
60.4 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
273 fps 319 fps Better texture detail.
+17%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
221 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+40%
158 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
265 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+14%
233 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
175 fps Faster complex splatting.
+20%
146 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
301 fps 361 fps Better peak texture detail.
+20%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
238 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+44%
165 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
281 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+11%
254 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
191 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+26%
151 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps +3% 154 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
134 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+44%
93 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+39%
69 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+8%
70 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
172 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+5%
164 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
112 fps +3% 108 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+20%
70 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
287 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+40%
205 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+43%
95 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,237,989 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.44 % Hugely higher market share.
+148%
0.58 %
Value
Value For Money
63.6 % +1% 62.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
138 % More popular.
+27%
109 %
Price
Price (score)
$275 $228 Cheaper.
+17%
Age
Newest
7 Months Much more recent.
+30%
10 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
323 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+28%
252 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
253 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+19%
213 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
299 fps Much better lighting effects.
+35%
222 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
236 fps Better reflection handling.
+16%
204 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580 from 2016, which in turn was a refresh of their RX 480 (2015). This iteration yields 15% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is reflected in the early benchmark data. This increased performance is fuelled by an increased power draw: the 580 had a TDP of 185W compared to the 590’s 225W, which compares to 210W for AMD’s high-performance Radeon RX Vega 56. Like the 8GB version of the RX 580, the RX 590 also has 8GB of GDDR5 with a 256GB/s memory bandwidth. With this iteration there isn’t a 4GB variant which is a good thing because 4GB can bottleneck an increasing proportion of games. Priced at $280, it is currently 20% more expensive than NVIDIA’s popular 6GB 1060, but is 12% faster in terms of effective speed. As a bonus, shoppers can get better value for money by purchasing one of the numerous game bundles that are currently available. [Nov '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback