CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
240 EFps 270 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+12%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
86 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+34%
64 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
99 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+16%
85 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
93 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+18%
79 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
120 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+30%
92 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 173,305 user samples
119,525 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 68% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 68% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 40th / 639
53,780 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 67% XFX(1682 9587)
Worst Bench: 58% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Poor: 58% Great: 67%
SPEED RANK: 49th / 639
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
73.7 % Faster effective speed.
+18%
62.7 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
293 fps Much better lighting effects.
+35%
217 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
218 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+38%
158 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
261 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+12%
232 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
319 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+27%
252 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
234 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+42%
165 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
278 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+10%
253 fps
Market Share
Based on 28,754,745 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.18 % Hugely higher market share.
+123%
0.53 %
Value
Value For Money
62.4 % 74.3 % Better value.
+19%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
140 % 149 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
Price
Price (score)
$280 $200 Cheaper.
+29%
Age
Newest
15 Months More recent.
+17%
18 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
250 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+18%
212 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
299 fps 360 fps Better peak texture detail.
+20%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
189 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+26%
150 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
234 fps Better reflection handling.
+18%
199 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
269 fps 318 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
175 fps Faster complex splatting.
+20%
146 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback