CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
214 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+11%
193 EFps
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
73 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+22%
60 EFps
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
87 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+34%
65 EFps
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+13%
70 EFps
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
99 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+34%
74 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 794,873 user samples
47,403 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 67% Asus(1043 86A7) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 622
747,470 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Gigabyte(1458 3739)
Worst Bench: 51% HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 51% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 52nd / 622
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
73.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+31%
56.2 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
273 fps Better texture detail.
+29%
212 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
220 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+49%
148 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
263 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+26%
208 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
177 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+9%
163 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
300 fps Better peak texture detail.
+25%
240 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
234 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+45%
161 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
279 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+25%
223 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
190 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+7%
177 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,503,643 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.36 % 4.4 % Hugely higher market share.
+224%
Value
Value For Money
67.2 % Much better value.
+44%
46.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
139 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
127 %
Price
Price (score)
$260 Slightly cheaper.
+9%
$285
Age
Newest
8 Months Much more recent.
+80%
40 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
322 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+33%
243 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
252 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+20%
210 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
300 fps Much better lighting effects.
+35%
222 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
237 fps Better reflection handling.
+22%
194 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback