CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
282 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+19%
236 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
128 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+64%
78 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
170 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+73%
98 EFps
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
151 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+61%
94 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
169 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+44%
117 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 170,641 user samples
125,388 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 133% MSI(1462 3726)
Worst Bench: 109% Asus(1043 8662)
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
SPEED RANK: 11th / 634
45,253 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 77% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 634
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
123 % Much faster effective speed.
+44%
85.3 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
495 fps Much better lighting effects.
+76%
282 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
381 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+108%
183 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
430 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+31%
327 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
558 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+63%
343 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
417 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+121%
189 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
468 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+28%
366 fps
Market Share
Based on 23,748,534 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.11 % Hugely higher market share.
+158%
0.43 %
Value
Value For Money
41.6 % 51.2 % Better value.
+23%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
91 % 115 % More popular.
+26%
Price
Price (score)
$700 $395 Much cheaper.
+44%
Age
Newest
16 Months Much more recent.
+45%
29 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
454 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+90%
239 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
586 fps +3% 568 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
269 fps 300 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+12%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
416 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+87%
223 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
517 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+7%
484 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
245 fps 288 fps Faster complex splatting.
+18%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's RTX 2080 is based on its new Turing architecture which boasts new AI and ray tracing technology that could eventually result in better GPU performance. Unfortunately there are currently no games which can take advantage of these new capabilities. The early 2080 benchmarks only exhibit a modest (20%) performance improvement over the 1080 which considering the new price tag of $800 for the Founders Edition is hard to stomach. The 2080 features 2944 CUDA cores, a base/boost speed of 1515/1710 MHz, 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. NVIDIA have also released the 2080 Ti which has marginally higher specs together with a jaw dropping price tag of $1200 for the Founders Edition. The RTX 2080 features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Unfortunately for gamers and other consumers, AMD’s top end GPUs such as the Vega 64 still lag NVIDIA's previous flagship 1080 Ti by 30% so there is very little pressure on NVIDIA to offer better value for money. The 2080 only has 8GB of RAM which is fine today but will likely haunt any early adopters that plan to keep the card for more than two years. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $224
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback