Real World Speed
Performance profile from 134,912 user samples
103,919 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 135% EVGA(3842 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 95% EVGA(3842 2081) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 95% Great: 135%
SPEED RANK: 10th / 621
30,993 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 67% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Poor: 67% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 31st / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
121 % Much faster effective speed.
+45%
83.9 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
515 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+7%
481 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
378 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+109%
181 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
427 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+33%
320 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
244 fps 283 fps Faster complex splatting.
+16%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
583 fps +1% 577 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
419 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+119%
191 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
472 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+29%
367 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
268 fps 301 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+12%
CSGO
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
248 fps Much Better CSGO fps.
+58%
157 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
178 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+46%
122 fps
PUBG
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
121 fps Much Better PUBG fps.
+33%
91 fps
GTAV
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
105 fps Much Better GTAV fps.
+37%
76 fps
LoL
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
256 fps Much Better LoL fps.
+37%
186 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
132 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+6%
125 fps
BF1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
130 fps Better BF1 fps.
+29%
101 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
121 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+42%
86 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
266 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+56%
170 fps
WoW
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
121 fps Much Better WoW fps.
+51%
80 fps
WoT
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
197 fps Much Better WoT fps.
+53%
129 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,888,273 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.53 % Hugely higher market share.
+168%
0.57 %
Value
Value For Money
44.2 % 65.2 % Much better value.
+47%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
76 % 109 % Much more popular.
+43%
Price
Price (score)
$650 $305 Much cheaper.
+53%
Age
Newest
12 Months Much more recent.
+54%
26 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
555 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+60%
347 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
454 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+91%
238 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
491 fps Much better lighting effects.
+68%
292 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
412 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+84%
224 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's RTX 2080 is based on its new Turing architecture which boasts new AI and ray tracing technology that could eventually result in better GPU performance. Unfortunately there are currently no games which can take advantage of these new capabilities. The early 2080 benchmarks only exhibit a modest (20%) performance improvement over the 1080 which considering the new price tag of $800 for the Founders Edition is hard to stomach. The 2080 features 2944 CUDA cores, a base/boost speed of 1515/1710 MHz, 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. NVIDIA have also released the 2080 Ti which has marginally higher specs together with a jaw dropping price tag of $1200 for the Founders Edition. Unfortunately for gamers and other consumers, AMD’s top end GPUs such as the Vega 64 still lag NVIDIA's previous flagship 1080 Ti by 30% so there is very little pressure on NVIDIA to offer better value for money. The 2080 only has 8GB of RAM which is fine today but will likely haunt any early adopters that plan to keep the card for more than two years. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $73
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $185Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback