Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 408,100 user samples
316,424 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 134% Sapphire(174B A500) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 109% Gigabyte(1458 37A5) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
SPEED RANK: 40th / 713
91,676 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% AMD(1002 6B76)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
124 % Much faster effective speed.
+43%
86.6 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
165 fps Much better lighting effects.
+49%
111 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
171 fps Much better reflection handling.
+58%
108 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
181 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+96%
92.3 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
146 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+11%
132 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
185 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+52%
122 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
229 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+101%
114 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
193 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+102%
95.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
158 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+10%
143 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
244 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+10%
223 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
179 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+48%
121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
122 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+17%
104 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
105 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+20%
88 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
251 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+30%
194 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
132 Fps +4% 127 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
131 Fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+35%
97 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
125 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+43%
88 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
284 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+41%
202 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
124 Fps Much Better WoW Fps.
+39%
89 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
198 Fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+58%
125 Fps
Market Share
Based on 68,680,375 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.67 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,240%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
108 % Hugely better value.
+111%
51.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
63 % More popular.
+19%
53 %
Price
Price (score)
$270 Much cheaper.
+32%
$400
Age
Newest
73 Months More recent.
+15%
86 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
191 fps 197 fps +3%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
133 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+70%
78.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
166 fps 178 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+7%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
123 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+62%
75.8 fps

NVIDIA's RTX 2080 is based on its new Turing architecture which boasts new AI and ray tracing technology that could eventually result in better GPU performance. Unfortunately there are currently no games which can take advantage of these new capabilities. The early 2080 benchmarks only exhibit a modest (20%) performance improvement over the 1080 which considering the new price tag of $800 for the Founders Edition is hard to stomach. The 2080 features 2944 CUDA cores, a base/boost speed of 1515/1710 MHz, 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. NVIDIA have also released the 2080 Ti which has marginally higher specs together with a jaw dropping price tag of $1200 for the Founders Edition. The RTX 2080 features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Unfortunately for gamers and other consumers, AMD’s top end GPUs such as the Vega 64 still lag NVIDIA's previous flagship 1080 Ti by 30% so there is very little pressure on NVIDIA to offer better value for money. The 2080 only has 8GB of RAM which is fine today but will likely haunt any early adopters that plan to keep the card for more than two years. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback