Real World Speed
Performance profile from 126,306 user samples
99,480 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 145% Asus(1043 8670)
Worst Bench: 54% Gigabyte(1458 37C2)
Poor: 54% Great: 145%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 620
26,826 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 128% PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 84% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 84% Great: 128%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 620
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
128 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+14%
112 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
396 fps 480 fps Better texture detail.
+21%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
351 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+93%
182 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
360 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+12%
322 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
223 fps 284 fps Faster complex splatting.
+27%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
470 fps 579 fps Better peak texture detail.
+23%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
391 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+102%
194 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
409 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+9%
374 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
249 fps 305 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+22%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
201 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+28%
157 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
148 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+23%
121 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
109 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+11%
98 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
106 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+38%
77 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
245 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+30%
188 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
124 fps 128 fps +3%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
123 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+12%
110 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+8%
92 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+14%
79 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
177 fps Much Better World of Tanks fps.
+40%
127 fps
Market Share
Based on 18,396,622 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.81 % Hugely higher market share.
+219%
0.88 %
Value
Value For Money
111 % 134 % Better value.
+20%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
88 % 90 % +2%
Price
Price (score)
$450 $280 Much cheaper.
+38%
Age
Newest
9 Months Much more recent.
+61%
23 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
436 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+23%
354 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
347 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+44%
241 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
372 fps Better lighting effects.
+27%
294 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
308 fps Much better reflection handling.
+36%
227 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $709Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $720SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback