CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
262 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+11%
236 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
114 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+46%
78 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
143 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+46%
98 EFps
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
137 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+46%
94 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
158 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+35%
117 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 208,139 user samples
168,563 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 117% MSI(1462 3734)
Worst Bench: 89% EVGA(3842 2172)
Poor: 89% Great: 117%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 635
39,576 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 77% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 635
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
106 % Faster effective speed.
+24%
85.8 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
378 fps Better lighting effects.
+30%
291 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
357 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+95%
183 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
367 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+12%
329 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
432 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+23%
351 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
391 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+105%
191 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
406 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+10%
369 fps
Market Share
Based on 23,914,117 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.61 % Hugely higher market share.
+293%
0.41 %
Value
Value For Money
63.1 % Better value.
+23%
51.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
105 % 114 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
Price
Price (score)
$400 $395 +1%
Age
Newest
15 Months Much more recent.
+48%
29 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
344 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+43%
240 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
469 fps 572 fps Better peak texture detail.
+22%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
246 fps 302 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+23%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
312 fps Much better reflection handling.
+38%
226 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
403 fps 488 fps Better texture detail.
+21%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
225 fps 288 fps Faster complex splatting.
+28%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback