Real World Speed
Performance profile from 166,334 user samples
130,297 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% MSI(1462 3732)
Worst Bench: 88% Asus(1043 867E) ≥ 4GB; ASUS ROG Strix
Poor: 88% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 621
36,037 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 64% PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 64% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 31st / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
102 % Faster effective speed.
+22%
83.6 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
410 fps 476 fps Better texture detail.
+16%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
362 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+101%
180 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
374 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+17%
319 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
229 fps 282 fps Faster complex splatting.
+23%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
468 fps 571 fps Better peak texture detail.
+22%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
393 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+105%
192 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
408 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+11%
366 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
248 fps 302 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+22%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
237 fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+51%
157 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
147 fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+20%
122 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
103 fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
+13%
91 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Better GTAV Fps.
+30%
76 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
241 fps Better LoL Fps.
+29%
186 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
122 fps 125 fps +2%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
116 fps Slightly Better BF1 Fps.
+14%
101 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
105 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+23%
86 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
276 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+62%
170 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
96 fps Better WoW Fps.
+20%
80 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
162 fps Better WoT Fps.
+26%
129 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,989,578 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.95 % Hugely higher market share.
+261%
0.54 %
Value
Value For Money
54.3 % 65 % Better value.
+20%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
100 % 109 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
Price
Price (score)
$445 $305 Much cheaper.
+31%
Age
Newest
12 Months Much more recent.
+54%
26 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
433 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+26%
344 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
345 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+45%
238 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
389 fps Much better lighting effects.
+34%
291 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
316 fps Much better reflection handling.
+40%
225 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $320Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback