Real World Speed
Performance profile from 464,137 user samples
3,076 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 254% Asus(1043 88A3)
Worst Bench: 216% Asus(1043 88A4)
Poor: 216% Great: 254%
SPEED RANK: 4th / 692
461,061 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% Sapphire(1DA2 E410) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 91% XFX(1682 5701)
Poor: 91% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 692
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
240 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+142%
99 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
349 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+179%
125 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
349 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+149%
140 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
474 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+302%
118 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
297 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+109%
142 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
375 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+176%
136 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
430 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+195%
146 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
510 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+318%
122 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
312 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+103%
154 fps
Market Share
Based on 58,532,565 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.05 % Hugely higher market share.
+209%
0.34 %
Value
Value For Money
71.1 % 81.3 % Better value.
+14%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
96 % Much more popular.
+66%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$800 $289 Much cheaper.
+64%
Age
Newest
0 Months Hugely more recent.
+100%
42 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
414 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+89%
219 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
224 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+128%
98.1 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
363 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+87%
194 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
214 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+126%
94.6 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RTX 4070-Ti is based on Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace architecture. It features 7,680 cores with base / boost clocks of 2.3 / 2.6 GHz, 12 GB of memory, a 192-bit memory bus, 60 3rd gen RT cores, 240 4th gen Tensor cores, DLSS 3 (with frame generation), a TDP of 285W and an MSRP of $800 USD. The 4070-Ti is around 50% faster than the 3070-Ti and offers similar performance to the 3090-Ti at less than half the price. Since the 4070-Ti only has 12GB-192-bit memory (vs 24GB-384-bit in the 3090-Ti) it is relatively weaker (5-10%) at 4K. Users tempted to consider the 7900 XT/X by AMD’s army of sponsored Advanced Marketers (youtube, reddit, twitter, forums etc.) should be aware that AMD have a history of releasing benchmark busting, heavily marketed, sub standard products. Although the 7900 XTX does outperform the 4070-Ti on paper, the 4070-Ti is more power efficient (quieter), has a broader feature set (RT/DLSS 3.0) and offers far better game compatibility (drivers). PC gamers still looking to join AMD’s “2%” GPU club (Steam stats: 5000/6000 series combined mkt share) need to work on their critical thinking skills: Influencers are paid handsomely to promote inferior products. Most gamers, who are best off playing at 1080p, should wait for the upcoming, better value, 4060 series cards. Shoppers looking for more affordable options in the near term should consider the previous gen 3060-Ti, which offers excellent real-world performance for $400 USD. [Jan '23 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2023 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $319Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $449Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3070 $568Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $163Nvidia RTX 3050 $298Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback