CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
204 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+8%
189 EFps
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
98 EFps Hugely Better GTAV EFps.
+123%
44 EFps
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
121 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+109%
58 EFps
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
102 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+112%
48 EFps
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
134 EFps Hugely Better Fortnite EFps.
+163%
51 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 135,324 user samples
27,144 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 105% Sapphire(1DA2 E411)
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 622
108,180 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 39% MSI(1462 341B)
Poor: 39% Great: 52%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 622
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
114 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+141%
47.2 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
772 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+215%
245 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
236 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+76%
134 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
394 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+125%
175 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
355 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+189%
123 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
862 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+210%
278 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
245 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+71%
143 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
422 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+119%
193 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
372 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+182%
132 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,504,111 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.69 % +3% 1.64 %
Value
Value For Money
66.8 % 86.1 % Better value.
+29%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
123 % More popular.
+22%
101 %
Price
Price (score)
$404 $130 Much cheaper.
+68%
Age
Newest
4 Months Hugely more recent.
+87%
30 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
443 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+124%
198 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
308 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+69%
182 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
403 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+133%
173 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
295 fps Much better reflection handling.
+77%
167 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable noise levels. The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps (EFps) gaming metrics as soon as possible. AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s latest 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The 500 series is built with second generation refined Polaris architecture and is a minor upgrade over the 400 series which was released just 10 months ago. On paper the RX 570 has a 3% higher boost clock speed, improved cooling and can deliver 224GB/s, compared to the RX 470’s 212GB/s. This should be sufficient for a smooth experience (min 60 fps) for many games (AMD reference Doom, Resident Evil Biohazard and Battlefield 1 at 1080p on ultra settings). Its die, with 2048 cores, is a cut down version of the new RX 580 (2384 cores) which is the $30 more expensive and around 14% faster flagship model from the 500 series. The 570 performs almost neck and neck with NVIDIA’s similarly priced, albeit 10 month old, GTX 1060-6GB. The Polaris refresh precedes AMD’s new Vega series of graphics cards due later this year for which details are currently unknown, but Vega is expected to yield a significant jump in performance. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback