CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
229 EFps 270 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+18%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+72%
64 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+62%
85 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
127 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+61%
79 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
157 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+71%
92 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 214,742 user samples
158,501 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% Sapphire(1DA2 E408)
Worst Bench: 100% ASRock(1849 5101) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 100% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 639
56,241 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% MSI(1462 C411)
Worst Bench: 57% PowerColor(148C 2391)
Poor: 57% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 639
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
106 % Much faster effective speed.
+70%
62.6 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
399 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+83%
218 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
239 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+51%
158 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
401 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+73%
232 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
446 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+76%
254 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
246 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+50%
164 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
428 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+69%
254 fps
Market Share
Based on 30,002,594 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.36 % Hugely higher market share.
+363%
0.51 %
Value
Value For Money
68 % 74.2 % Slightly better value.
+9%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
126 % 150 % More popular.
+19%
Price
Price (score)
$370 $200 Much cheaper.
+46%
Age
Newest
11 Months Much more recent.
+42%
19 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
308 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+46%
211 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
844 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+133%
362 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
380 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+153%
150 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
295 fps Much better reflection handling.
+48%
200 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
744 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+133%
319 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
365 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+152%
145 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $157Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback