Real World Speed
Performance profile from 891,794 user samples
286,928 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 96% Asus(1043 05C1) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 96% Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 25th / 652
604,866 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 150% Zotac(19DA 4471) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 114% MSI(1462 3602)
Poor: 114% Great: 150%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 652
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
107 % 136 % Faster effective speed.
+27%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
133 fps 167 fps Better lighting effects.
+26%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
142 fps 192 fps Much better reflection handling.
+35%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
116 fps 133 fps Faster multi rendering.
+15%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
135 fps 177 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+31%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
147 fps 186 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+27%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
148 fps 275 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+86%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
121 fps 142 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+17%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
146 fps 194 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+33%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
242 Fps 247 Fps +2%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
167 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+13%
148 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 Fps 102 Fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
+9%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
117 Fps Slightly Better GTAV Fps.
+10%
107 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
225 Fps 235 Fps +5%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
135 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+5%
128 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps +0% 115 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
215 Fps 250 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+16%
Market Share
Based on 38,294,120 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.9 % +2% 1.87 %
Value
Value For Money
63.5 % Much better value.
+59%
39.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
75 % Slightly more popular.
+7%
70 %
Price
Price (score)
$400 Much cheaper.
+50%
$808
Age
Newest
18 Months Much more recent.
+61%
46 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
234 fps Better peak texture detail.
+16%
201 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
99.3 fps 132 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+33%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
197 fps Better texture detail.
+12%
176 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
95.4 fps 122 fps Faster complex splatting.
+28%
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Hyped as the "Ultimate GEforce", the 1080 Ti is NVIDIA's latest flagship 4K VR ready GPU. It supersedes last years GTX 1080, offering a 30% increase in performance for a 40% premium (founders edition 1080 Tis will be priced at $699, pushing down the price of the 1080 to $499). It also supersedes the prohibitively expensive Titan X Pascal, pushing it off poll position in performance rankings. The 1080 Ti is based on the Pascal architecture and features a slightly modified version of the same flagship GP102 silicon found in the Titan X Pascal. It has 11GB of the high bandwidth GDDR5X video memory (versus 12GB in the Titan X Pascal) and an impressive 11GB frame buffer. Like the Titan X Pascal, it features 12bn transistors and 3584 CUDA cores which can run at a boost clock speed of 1.582 GHz – 3% faster than the Titan X Pascal's 1.531 GHz. This increased speed is partially attributable to the 1080 Ti’s new dualFET power system which allows the chip to run at higher power and more efficiently than ever before. The release of the 1080 Ti comes ahead of the competition from AMD's Vega - rumored for release in Q2 2017. Vega is AMD's next generation graphics card (following on from Polaris 10) featuring their new HBM2 die which is alleged to have eight times the capacity of GDDR5 with half of the footprint. NVDIA's own next generation graphics cards (Volta) are in the pipeline for 2018. [Mar '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $208Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback