Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,095,176 user samples
840,268 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 133% EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 109% Gigabyte(1458 374D) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 714
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
124 % Faster effective speed.
+26%
98.3 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
167 fps Much better lighting effects.
+35%
124 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
190 fps Much better reflection handling.
+37%
139 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
132 fps Faster multi rendering.
+12%
118 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
176 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+26%
140 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
184 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+38%
133 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
257 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+76%
146 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
141 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+16%
122 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
192 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+27%
151 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
247 Fps +2% 242 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
148 Fps 167 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+13%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
102 Fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
+9%
94 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
107 Fps 117 Fps Slightly Better GTAV Fps.
+10%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
235 Fps +5% 225 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 Fps 135 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps 115 Fps +0%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
250 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+16%
215 Fps
Market Share
Based on 67,414,161 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.37 % Hugely higher market share.
+706%
0.17 %
Value
Value For Money
60.4 % 93.2 % Much better value.
+54%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
76 % Much more popular.
+31%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$485 $250 Much cheaper.
+48%
Age
Newest
85 Months 57 Months Much more recent.
+33%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
199 fps 229 fps Better peak texture detail.
+15%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
131 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+33%
98.2 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
175 fps 205 fps Better texture detail.
+17%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
122 fps Faster complex splatting.
+29%
94.3 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Hyped as the "Ultimate GeForce", the 1080 Ti is NVIDIA's latest flagship 4K VR ready GPU. It supersedes last years GTX 1080, offering a 20% increase in performance for a 40% premium (founders edition 1080 Tis will be priced at $699, pushing down the price of the 1080 to $499). It also supersedes the prohibitively expensive Titan X Pascal, pushing it off poll position in performance rankings. The 1080 Ti is based on the Pascal architecture and features a slightly modified version of the same flagship GP102 silicon found in the Titan X Pascal. It has 11GB of the high bandwidth GDDR5X video memory (versus 12GB in the Titan X Pascal) and an impressive 11GB frame buffer. Like the Titan X Pascal, it features 12bn transistors and 3584 CUDA cores which can run at a boost clock speed of 1.582 GHz – 3% faster than the Titan X Pascal's 1.531 GHz. This increased speed is partially attributable to the 1080 Ti’s new dualFET power system which allows the chip to run at higher power and more efficiently than ever before. The release of the 1080 Ti comes ahead of the competition from AMD's Vega - rumored for release in Q2 2017. Vega is AMD's next generation graphics card (following on from Polaris 10) featuring their new HBM2 die which is alleged to have eight times the capacity of GDDR5 with half of the footprint. NVDIA's own next generation graphics cards (Volta) are in the pipeline for 2018. [Mar '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback