CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
199 EFps 204 EFps +3%
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
50 EFps 98 EFps Hugely Better GTAV EFps.
+96%
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
68 EFps 121 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+78%
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
61 EFps 102 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+67%
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
68 EFps 134 EFps Hugely Better Fortnite EFps.
+97%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 324,126 user samples
292,718 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Worst Bench: 46% Asus(1043 0517)
Poor: 46% Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 55th / 625
31,408 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% MSI(1462 3816) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 102% Gigabyte(1458 2313)
Poor: 102% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
54.2 % 114 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+110%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
283 fps 776 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+174%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
146 fps 236 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+62%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
209 fps 395 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+89%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
131 fps 356 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+172%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
321 fps 866 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+170%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
154 fps 245 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+59%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
229 fps 423 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+85%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
138 fps 373 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+170%
Market Share
Based on 21,548,193 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.95 % Much higher market share.
+71%
1.73 %
Value
Value For Money
71.4 % Slightly better value.
+7%
66.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
129 % +4% 124 %
Price
Price (score)
$180 Much cheaper.
+55%
$404
Age
Newest
30 Months 4 Months Hugely more recent.
+87%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
229 fps 441 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+93%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
191 fps 308 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+61%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
200 fps 401 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+100%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
179 fps 296 fps Much better reflection handling.
+65%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable noise levels. The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps (EFps) gaming metrics as soon as possible. AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback