Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
270 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+18%
229 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
64 EFps 110 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+72%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
85 EFps 138 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+62%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps 127 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+61%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
92 EFps 157 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+71%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 376,968 user samples
122,060 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% PowerColor(148C 2391)
Worst Bench: 51% MSI(1462 C411)
Poor: 51% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 117th / 713
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.9 % 98.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+73%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
71.8 fps 124 fps Much better lighting effects.
+73%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
68.1 fps 139 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+104%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
67.7 fps 118 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+74%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
81.4 fps 140 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+72%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
79.8 fps 133 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+67%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
70.5 fps 146 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+107%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
71.3 fps 122 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+71%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
90.3 fps 151 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+67%
Market Share
Based on 68,672,517 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.08 % 0.35 % Hugely higher market share.
+337%
Value
Value For Money
168 % Hugely better value.
+92%
87.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
77 % Much more popular.
+31%
59 %
Price
Price (score)
$80 Much cheaper.
+70%
$266
Age
Newest
71 Months 64 Months Slightly more recent.
+10%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
111 fps 229 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+106%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
54 fps 98.2 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+82%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
99.9 fps 205 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+105%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
52.7 fps 94.3 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+79%

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback