CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
270 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+24%
217 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
64 EFps 78 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+22%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
85 EFps 120 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+41%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps 116 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+47%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
92 EFps 128 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+39%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 82,542 user samples
62,302 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Worst Bench: 57% Gigabyte(1458 2311)
Poor: 57% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 639
20,240 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 90% Sapphire(1DA2 E411)
Worst Bench: 81% Gigabyte(1458 231C)
Poor: 81% Great: 90%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 639
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
62.6 % 87.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+39%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
217 fps 329 fps Much better lighting effects.
+52%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
159 fps 201 fps Faster multi rendering.
+26%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
232 fps 327 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+41%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
254 fps 370 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+46%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
165 fps 208 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+26%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
255 fps 339 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+33%
Market Share
Based on 31,189,664 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.49 % 0.74 % Much higher market share.
+51%
Value
Value For Money
74.2 % 76.5 % +3%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
149 % +4% 143 %
Price
Price (score)
$200 Cheaper.
+26%
$270
Age
Newest
20 Months 6 Months Much more recent.
+70%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
214 fps 269 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+26%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
362 fps 682 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+88%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
151 fps 325 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+115%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
200 fps 255 fps Better reflection handling.
+28%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
320 fps 597 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+87%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
146 fps 315 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+116%
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 6GB AMD 5600 XT is a slightly cheaper, BIOS restricted, version of the 8GB 5700. The majority of 5600 XT’s should operate reasonably quietly as the single fan reference design was skipped for this release. Although the reference design is absent there are, however, several variants which range in performance between the GTX 1660S and the RTX 2060. Performance is more varied than usual because of last minute BIOS changes. The best versions of the 5600 XT (Sapphire Pulse) were distributed to reviewers (good luck finding one of these at MSRP). These models are capable, with BIOS updates, of performance that almost matches the RTX 2060. At $280 USD the higher performing SKUs could make sense for users that are happy to tinker with or return faulty hardware. During our GTAV testing reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appears on several Navi and Vega cards). Whilst playing Project Cars 2 our 5600 XT PC crashed several times. Given the vast number of software (and hardware) problems since day one of the 5000 series launch, it’s ironic that AMD’s latest 20.1.3 driver does not even offer an option to skip the installation of a boatload of new system shortcuts, gimmicks and other bloatware. [Jan '20 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback