Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
270 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+23%
220 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
64 EFps 97 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+52%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
85 EFps 133 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+56%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps 125 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+58%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
92 EFps 143 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+55%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 197,978 user samples
122,060 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% PowerColor(148C 2391)
Worst Bench: 51% MSI(1462 C411)
Poor: 51% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 117th / 713
75,918 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% XFX(1682 5705)
Worst Bench: 78% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 78% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 87th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.9 % 85 % Much faster effective speed.
+49%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
71.8 fps 107 fps Much better lighting effects.
+49%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
68.1 fps 122 fps Much better reflection handling.
+79%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
67.7 fps 103 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+52%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
81.4 fps 120 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+47%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
79.8 fps 115 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+44%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
70.5 fps 136 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+93%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
71.3 fps 114 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+60%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
90.3 fps 129 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+43%
Market Share
Based on 68,673,497 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.08 % Much higher market share.
+33%
0.06 %
Value
Value For Money
168 % Hugely better value.
+130%
73.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
77 % More popular.
+13%
68 %
Price
Price (score)
$80 Much cheaper.
+71%
$275
Age
Newest
71 Months 64 Months Slightly more recent.
+10%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
111 fps 180 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+62%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
54 fps 91 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+69%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
99.9 fps 164 fps Much better texture detail.
+64%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
52.7 fps 80.2 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+52%

AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. The 590 does not have a 4GB variant which is good for longevity. At launch the 590 was priced at $280, which was 20% more expensive and 7% faster than Nvidia’s then popular 6GB 1060. In today’s market the 590 can be found for little as $170. For more than 90% of gamers (≤1080p) the RX 590 (at $170) represents the best value for money available. Since the GPU is by far the most important component in a gaming PC, it is usually worth spending more on it. The next step up from a 590 would be to Nvidia’s comparable $230 1660S. The 1660S is a more refined card, less heat results in less fan noise, but both are capable of delivering silky smooth 60+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s 8GB Radeon RX 5700 is a mid-range Navi 10 GPU. The 5700 has 36 compute units (compared to 40 in the 5700 XT). At $349 USD, the 5700 is more affordable than the $399 USD 5700 XT which is approximately 10% faster and more power hungry (225W vs 180W). Unlike the benchmark busting reference XT which overheats and chokes on its default settings, the reference 5700 (non XT), though still noisy, is able to maintain composure and is capable of delivering a very respectable 100+ EFps. This puts it 5% ahead of the RTX 2060 and just 8% behind the RTX 2060S in most of today’s popular games. In terms of compatibility the short test runs in our lab had issues with GTAV where reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Prices are necessary to confirm which graphics card offers the best bang for your buck but there is certainly a lot more choice in the upper end of the GPU market. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback