Real World Speed
Performance profile from 74,464 user samples
34,101 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 74% Asus(1043 04C4)
Poor: 74% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 25th / 621
40,363 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 24% Sapphire(174B E344)
Worst Bench: 18% Sapphire(174B E348)
Poor: 18% Great: 24%
SPEED RANK: 125th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
93 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+333%
21.5 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
546 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+435%
102 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
187 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+196%
63.2 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
373 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+388%
76.4 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
293 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+280%
77.2 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
629 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+433%
118 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
195 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+198%
65.5 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
424 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+395%
85.7 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
308 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+283%
80.4 fps
CSGO
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
223 fps Hugely Better CSGO fps.
+92%
116 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps Hugely Better Fortnite fps.
+145%
50 fps
GTAV
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps Hugely Better GTAV fps.
+118%
40 fps
LoL
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
188 fps Much Better LoL fps.
+67%
112 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
128 fps Hugely Better Overwatch fps.
+115%
59 fps
BF1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97 fps Hugely Better BF1 fps.
+126%
43 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
89 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+181%
32 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
214 fps Hugely Better Minecraft fps.
+120%
97 fps
WoT
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Hugely Better WoT fps.
+173%
46 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,886,359 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.39 % Much higher market share.
+77%
0.22 %
Value
Value For Money
44.1 % 48.5 % Slightly better value.
+10%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % Much more popular.
+31%
81 %
Price
Price (score)
$500 $105 Much cheaper.
+79%
Age
Newest
26 Months Much more recent.
+32%
38 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
372 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+321%
88.3 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
244 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+190%
84.1 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
321 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+323%
75.8 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
233 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+193%
79.6 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $73
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $185Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback