Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 504,186 user samples
412,133 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% MSI(1462 C300)
Worst Bench: 86% Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 86% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 73rd / 713
92,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
93.7 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
78 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
118 fps Better lighting effects.
+20%
98.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
135 fps Better reflection handling.
+29%
105 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
93.1 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+5%
88.6 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
123 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+8%
114 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
129 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+18%
109 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
190 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+70%
112 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
99 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+5%
94.1 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
133 fps +4% 128 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
200 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+27%
158 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
129 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+10%
117 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 Fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
+6%
89 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
85 Fps +3% 82 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
204 Fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+8%
189 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
125 Fps +2% 123 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 Fps 108 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
92 Fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+6%
87 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
259 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+31%
198 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
150 Fps 150 Fps +0%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 Fps Better WoW Fps.
+23%
79 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 Fps 130 Fps +1%
Market Share
Based on 68,447,424 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.67 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,575%
0.04 %
Value
Value For Money
74.3 % 109 % Much better value.
+46%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % More popular.
+21%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$299 $170 Much cheaper.
+43%
Age
Newest
83 Months +2% 85 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
133 fps 175 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+32%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
118 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+52%
77.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
119 fps 155 fps Much better texture detail.
+30%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
110 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+48%
74.5 fps

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is Nvidia’s latest HD and VR ready, gaming GPU and is successor to the current number one GPU by market share, the GTX 1070. Like the 1070, the 1070 Ti is based on the16nm Pascal architecture and GP104 GPU. Both feature 8 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 256 bit memory interface producing a total memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s, and both have a rated boost clock speed of 1.683 GHz. The 1070 Ti is basically the 1070 with 25% more working CUDA cores (2432 versus 1920) and slightly higher base clock of 1607MHz (versus 1506MHz in the 1070). This translates to the 1070 Ti being nearly as powerful as the GTX 1080 which has 2560 CUDA cores, 8 GB of GDRR5X memory and boost clock of 1733 GHz. With founder’s editions available at $449, compared to $470 for AMD’s recent Vega based RX 56 and $510 for the GTX 1080, the 1070 Ti represents good value for money. The rumored fast approaching release of Volta (NVIDIA’s next generation architecture following on from Pascal) in early 2018 may upset demand for the 1070 Ti. [Nov '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback