Real World Speed
Performance profile from 504,186 user samples
412,133 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% MSI(1462 C300)
Worst Bench: 86% Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 86% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 67th / 705
92,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 86th / 705
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
93.7 % Faster effective speed.
78 %
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
118 fps Better lighting effects.
98.3 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
135 fps Better reflection handling.
105 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
93.1 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
88.6 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
123 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
114 fps
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
129 fps Better peak lighting effects.
109 fps
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
190 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
112 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
99 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
94.1 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
133 fps +4% 128 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
200 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
158 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
129 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
117 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
94 Fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
89 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
85 Fps +3% 82 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
204 Fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
189 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
125 Fps +2% 123 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 Fps 108 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
92 Fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
87 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
259 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
198 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
150 Fps 150 Fps +0%
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 Fps Better WoW Fps.
79 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 Fps 130 Fps +1%
Market Share
Based on 65,863,278 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.65 % Hugely higher market share.
0.08 %
Value For Money
74.3 % 109 % Much better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % More popular.
58 %
Price (score)
$299 $170 Much cheaper.
73 Months +3% 75 Months
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
133 fps 175 fps Much better peak texture detail.
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
118 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
77.6 fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
119 fps 155 fps Much better texture detail.
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
110 fps Much faster complex splatting.
74.5 fps

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is Nvidia’s latest HD and VR ready, gaming GPU and is successor to the current number one GPU by market share, the GTX 1070. Like the 1070, the 1070 Ti is based on the16nm Pascal architecture and GP104 GPU. Both feature 8 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 256 bit memory interface producing a total memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s, and both have a rated boost clock speed of 1.683 GHz. The 1070 Ti is basically the 1070 with 25% more working CUDA cores (2432 versus 1920) and slightly higher base clock of 1607MHz (versus 1506MHz in the 1070). This translates to the 1070 Ti being nearly as powerful as the GTX 1080 which has 2560 CUDA cores, 8 GB of GDRR5X memory and boost clock of 1733 GHz. With founder’s editions available at $449, compared to $470 for AMD’s recent Vega based RX 56 and $510 for the GTX 1080, the 1070 Ti represents good value for money. The rumored fast approaching release of Volta (NVIDIA’s next generation architecture following on from Pascal) in early 2018 may upset demand for the 1070 Ti. [Nov '17 GPUPro]


The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2023 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $149Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $189Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback