Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
251 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+6%
236 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
87 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+12%
78 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
112 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+14%
98 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
109 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+16%
94 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
116 EFps 117 EFps +1%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,551,334 user samples
1,459,281 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Zotac(19DA 1435)
Worst Bench: 71% PNY(196E 11A0) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 89th / 713
92,053 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
79.7 % +2% 78 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
98.6 fps +0% 98.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
112 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+7%
105 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
93 fps +5% 88.6 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
97.9 fps 114 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+16%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
110 fps +1% 109 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
156 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+39%
112 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
99.3 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+6%
94.1 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
106 fps 128 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+21%
Market Share
Based on 68,770,609 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.73 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,360%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
67.9 % 109 % Much better value.
+60%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
78 % Much more popular.
+34%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$278 $170 Much cheaper.
+39%
Age
Newest
101 Months 87 Months More recent.
+14%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
110 fps 175 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+59%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
103 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+33%
77.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
98.2 fps 155 fps Much better texture detail.
+58%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
96.2 fps Faster complex splatting.
+29%
74.5 fps

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback