CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
251 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+6%
236 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
87 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+12%
78 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
112 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+14%
98 EFps
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
109 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+16%
94 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
116 EFps 117 EFps +1%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 804,270 user samples
759,017 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% MSI(1462 3302)
Worst Bench: 72% EVGA(3842 5173)
Poor: 72% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 34th / 634
45,253 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 77% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 634
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
79.1 % 85.3 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
309 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+10%
282 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
202 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+10%
183 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
290 fps 327 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+13%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
347 fps +1% 343 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
214 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+13%
189 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
315 fps 366 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+16%
Market Share
Based on 23,705,040 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3.69 % Hugely higher market share.
+739%
0.44 %
Value
Value For Money
54.1 % Slightly better value.
+6%
51.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
121 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
114 %
Price
Price (score)
$346 Slightly cheaper.
+12%
$395
Age
Newest
43 Months 29 Months Much more recent.
+33%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
312 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+31%
239 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
352 fps 568 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+61%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
244 fps 300 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+23%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
287 fps Better reflection handling.
+29%
223 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
311 fps 484 fps Much better texture detail.
+56%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
226 fps 288 fps Faster complex splatting.
+27%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback