CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
251 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+6%
236 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
87 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+12%
78 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
112 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+14%
98 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
109 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+16%
94 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
116 EFps 117 EFps +1%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,318,698 user samples
1,236,286 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% EVGA(3842 6276)
Worst Bench: 73% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 73% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 55th / 666
82,412 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 93% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 72% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Poor: 72% Great: 93%
SPEED RANK: 54th / 666
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
80.2 % 82.5 % +3%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
100 fps +1% 98.8 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
113 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+8%
105 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
94.1 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+7%
88.3 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
98.9 fps 110 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+11%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
111 fps 114 fps +3%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
149 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+32%
113 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
103 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+9%
94.2 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
107 fps 124 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+16%
Market Share
Based on 46,331,230 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.32 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,685%
0.13 %
Value
Value For Money
47.5 % Slightly better value.
+6%
44.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
77 % More popular.
+12%
69 %
Price
Price (score)
$400 Slightly cheaper.
+8%
$436
Age
Newest
63 Months 49 Months More recent.
+22%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
112 fps 182 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+62%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
105 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+34%
78.3 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
99.8 fps 155 fps Much better texture detail.
+55%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
95.9 fps Faster complex splatting.
+29%
74.5 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback