Real World Speed
Performance profile from 745,568 user samples
706,612 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Zotac(19DA 1435)
Worst Bench: 69% MSI(1462 3302)
Poor: 69% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 625
38,956 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 72% MSI(1462 3681)
Poor: 72% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
78.3 % 84.5 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
311 fps 480 fps Much better texture detail.
+54%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
201 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+11%
181 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
289 fps 321 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+11%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
224 fps 284 fps Faster complex splatting.
+27%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
349 fps 563 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+61%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
218 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+14%
192 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
315 fps 366 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+16%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
245 fps 304 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+24%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
198 fps Better CSGO Fps.
+26%
157 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
122 fps 122 fps +1%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 fps 91 fps Slightly Better PUBG Fps.
+14%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
78 fps +2% 76 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
211 fps Slightly Better LoL Fps.
+13%
186 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 fps 125 fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+9%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 101 fps Slightly Better BF1 Fps.
+6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 fps 86 fps +5%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
222 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+31%
170 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
89 fps Slightly Better WoW Fps.
+11%
80 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 fps 129 fps +1%
Market Share
Based on 21,548,193 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3.87 % Hugely higher market share.
+706%
0.48 %
Value
Value For Money
50.3 % 62.6 % Better value.
+24%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
111 % 112 % +1%
Price
Price (score)
$369 $320 Slightly cheaper.
+13%
Age
Newest
41 Months 27 Months Much more recent.
+34%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
343 fps 347 fps +1%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
311 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+30%
240 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
308 fps +4% 297 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
287 fps Better reflection handling.
+26%
227 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback