Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,550,957 user samples
1,459,281 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Zotac(19DA 1435)
Worst Bench: 71% PNY(196E 11A0) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 89th / 713
91,676 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% AMD(1002 6B76)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
79.7 % 86.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
98.6 fps 111 fps Better lighting effects.
+13%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
112 fps +4% 108 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
93 fps +1% 92.3 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
97.9 fps 132 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+35%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
110 fps 122 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+11%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
156 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+37%
114 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
99.3 fps +4% 95.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
106 fps 143 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+35%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
193 Fps 223 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+15%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps +0% 121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 Fps 104 Fps Better PUBG Fps.
+30%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
78 Fps 88 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+13%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
202 Fps +4% 194 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps 127 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+11%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 Fps 97 Fps +2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
81 Fps 88 Fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+8%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
253 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+25%
202 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
89 Fps 89 Fps +0%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
128 Fps +2% 125 Fps
Market Share
Based on 68,771,497 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.77 % Insanely higher market share.
+4,325%
0.04 %
Value
Value For Money
67.9 % Much better value.
+32%
51.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
78 % Much more popular.
+47%
53 %
Price
Price (score)
$278 Much cheaper.
+30%
$400
Age
Newest
101 Months 87 Months More recent.
+14%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
110 fps 197 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+79%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
103 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+31%
78.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
98.2 fps 178 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+81%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
96.2 fps Faster complex splatting.
+27%
75.8 fps

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $284WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback