CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
206 EFps 214 EFps +4%
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
75 EFps +3% 73 EFps
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
93 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+7%
87 EFps
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
93 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+18%
79 EFps
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
93 EFps 99 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+6%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 755,905 user samples
706,612 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Zotac(19DA 1435)
Worst Bench: 69% MSI(1462 3302)
Poor: 69% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 625
49,293 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 68% Asus(1043 869F)
Poor: 68% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
78.3 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6%
73.8 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
311 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+14%
274 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
201 fps 220 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+9%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
289 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+9%
264 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
224 fps Faster complex splatting.
+27%
177 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
349 fps Better peak texture detail.
+16%
301 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
218 fps 243 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+11%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
315 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+12%
280 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
245 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+29%
190 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,548,579 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3.87 % Hugely higher market share.
+171%
1.43 %
Value
Value For Money
50.3 % 67.3 % Much better value.
+34%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
111 % 139 % More popular.
+25%
Price
Price (score)
$369 $260 Cheaper.
+30%
Age
Newest
41 Months 8 Months Hugely more recent.
+80%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
343 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+7%
322 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
311 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+23%
252 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
308 fps +3% 299 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
287 fps Better reflection handling.
+21%
237 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback