UserBenchmark: AMD RX 5700-XT vs Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti

GPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR GPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nvidia

BUY • $441

AMD

BUY • $250

BenchYourGPU

Watch Gameplay


CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max	293 EFps	Better CSGO EFps. +28%	229 EFps
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max	136 EFps	Better GTAV EFps. +24%	110 EFps
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max	221 EFps	Much Better Overwatch EFps. +60%	138 EFps
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max	174 EFps	Much Better PUBG EFps. +37%	127 EFps
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max	199 EFps	Better Fortnite EFps. +27%	157 EFps

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 612,854 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

357,946 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 174% Gigabyte(1458 37BB) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 128% Asus(1043 8667)

Poor: 128% Great: 174%

SPEED RANK: 26^th / 714

254,908 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 91% Great: 104%

SPEED RANK: 66^th / 714


Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed		156 %	Much faster effective speed. +58%		98.3 %


Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	209 fps	Much better lighting effects. +69%	124 fps
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	208 fps	Much better reflection handling. +50%	139 fps
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)	257 fps	Hugely faster multi rendering. +118%	118 fps
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)	211 fps	Much faster NBody calculation. +51%	140 fps


Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	239 fps	Much better peak lighting effects. +80%	133 fps
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	308 fps	Hugely better peak reflection handling. +111%	146 fps
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)	286 fps	Hugely faster peak multi rendering. +134%	122 fps
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)	240 fps	Much faster peak NBody calculation. +59%	151 fps

Market Share

Based on 67,426,957 GPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.55 %	Much higher market share. +77%	0.31 %
Value Value For Money	83.6 %		93.2 %	Better value. +11%
User Rating UBM User Rating	72 %	More popular. +24%	58 %
Price Price (score)	$441		$250	Much cheaper. +43%


Age Newest	67 Months		57 Months	More recent. +15%
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	268 fps	Better peak texture detail. +17%	229 fps
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	184 fps	Hugely faster peak complex splatting. +87%	98.2 fps
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	231 fps	Better texture detail. +13%	205 fps
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	163 fps	Much faster complex splatting. +73%	94.3 fps

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. The 2080 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. ^{[Sep '18 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. ^{[Jul '19 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

What is the MRender GPU benchmark?

What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?

What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?

What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?

What is the GPU value for money rating?

What is the effective GPU speed index?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback