CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
278 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+21%
229 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
136 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+24%
110 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
212 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+54%
138 EFps
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
172 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+35%
127 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
187 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+19%
157 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 159,796 user samples
98,547 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 198% EVGA(3842 2589) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 75% Gigabyte(1458 37B9) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 75% Great: 198%
SPEED RANK: 4th / 634
61,249 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 99% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 99% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 634
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
171 % Much faster effective speed.
+62%
106 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
585 fps Much better lighting effects.
+48%
395 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
514 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+116%
238 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
610 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+53%
399 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
715 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+62%
441 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
600 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+144%
246 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
714 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+68%
425 fps
Market Share
Based on 23,709,357 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.51 % 2.1 % Much higher market share.
+39%
Value
Value For Money
36.9 % 61.1 % Much better value.
+66%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
106 % 123 % More popular.
+16%
Price
Price (score)
$1,100 $410 Much cheaper.
+63%
Age
Newest
16 Months 6 Months Much more recent.
+62%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
629 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+104%
308 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
829 fps 869 fps +5%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
349 fps 378 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+8%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
542 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+85%
293 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
693 fps 779 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+12%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
306 fps 363 fps Faster complex splatting.
+19%
ADVERTISEMENT

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. The 2080 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback