CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
293 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+28%
229 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
136 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+24%
110 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
221 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+60%
138 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
174 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+37%
127 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
199 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+27%
157 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 271,583 user samples
140,605 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 196% Nvidia(10DE 12FA) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% MSI(1462 3715)
Poor: 70% Great: 196%
SPEED RANK: 5th / 639
130,978 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% Gigabyte(1458 2316) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 100% MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 100% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 639
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
168 % Much faster effective speed.
+57%
107 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
586 fps Much better lighting effects.
+48%
397 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
509 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+112%
240 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
595 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+48%
403 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
708 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+58%
449 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
599 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+143%
247 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
700 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+62%
431 fps
Market Share
Based on 28,713,356 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.42 % 2.23 % Much higher market share.
+57%
Value
Value For Money
33.7 % 61.7 % Hugely better value.
+83%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
117 % 123 % Slightly more popular.
+5%
Price
Price (score)
$1,180 $410 Much cheaper.
+65%
Age
Newest
20 Months 10 Months Much more recent.
+50%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
630 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+103%
310 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
828 fps 855 fps +3%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
345 fps 381 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+10%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
540 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+84%
294 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
690 fps 756 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+10%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
301 fps 368 fps Faster complex splatting.
+22%
ADVERTISEMENT

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. The 2080 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $54
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback