COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
AMD
$900
▲ 8215,434 ▼

Release date: Q1 2019.

VS
▲ 521,317 ▼
 $900 

Release date: Q4 2022.

Effective Speed 
+190%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 325,291 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
318,562 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Poor: 70% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 95th / 713
6,729 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 249% Asus(1043 05ED) ≥ 4GB
Poor bench: 176% XFX(1EAE 7905) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 176% Great: 249%
SPEED RANK: 8th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		76 % 220 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+190%
Average Score 
+246%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		96.9 fps 276 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+185%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		98.8 fps 389 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+294%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		96.9 fps 435 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+349%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		89.4 fps 228 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+155%
Overclocked Score 
+251%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		104 fps 326 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+213%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		134 fps 470 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+251%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		103 fps 484 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+370%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		93.8 fps 254 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+171%
Value & Sentiment 
+140%
Market Share
Based on 68,763,220 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.92 % Hugely higher market share.
+300% 		0.23 %
Value
Value For Money 		126 % Hugely better value.
+117% 		58 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		82 % Much more popular.
+58% 		52 %
Price
Price (score) 		$143 Hugely cheaper.
+84% 		$900
Nice To Haves 
+432%
Age
Newest 		68 Months 23 Months Much more recent.
+66%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		95.9 fps 661 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+589%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		80.1 fps 462 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+477%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		87.6 fps 592 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+576%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		75.7 fps 416 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+450%
Conclusion 
Average Bench 76%
Average Bench 220%

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s new 7900 series GPUs received a lot of pre-launch hype. There were claims of 50-70% performance improvements over the previous flagship. Our benchmarks show that the 7900-XTX leads the 6950-XT by around 30%. AMD overhype their product launches because it is effective at getting first-time buyers to pay over MRSP. After an initial burst in sales, prices often drop rapidly, as with the 6900 XT and the recently launched Zen 4 7950X, which are now both 30% cheaper. AMD’s domination of social media platforms has historically resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products, those users will be very hard, if not impossible for AMD to win back. If this trend continues, semiconductors may become a secondary business line for AMD, who appear more focused on developing “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers and media outlets. Based on the volume of social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Be wary of sponsored reviews (golden samples+cherry picked games) that showcase the wins and gloss over the losses whilst conveniently ignoring frame drops. Despite steady price cuts, an increasing number of seasoned gamers simply have no interest in buying AMD products. They know from bitter experience that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. Most gamers, who are better off playing at 1080p, will do well to wait for Nvidia’s upcoming 4060/4070 series cards (est. early 2023). Even brand fans that wish to be in AMD’s “2%” club, will find better deals after the launch hype settles. Shoppers should avoid AMD’s reference design as many users are reporting thermal issues. [Dec '22 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
318,562
6,729
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback