Real World Speed
Performance profile from 123,109 user samples
116,327 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3)
Worst Bench: 67% Asus(1043 869F)
Poor: 67% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 40th / 639
6,782 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 118% AMD(1002 081E)
Worst Bench: 105% AMD(1002 081E)
Poor: 105% Great: 118%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 639
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
73.7 % 112 % Much faster effective speed.
+52%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
293 fps 370 fps Better lighting effects.
+26%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
218 fps +0% 217 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
261 fps 438 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+68%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
318 fps 414 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+30%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
237 fps +2% 232 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
277 fps 462 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+67%
Market Share
Based on 28,532,272 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.18 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,260%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
62.4 % Hugely better value.
+97%
31.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
139 % Much more popular.
+76%
79 %
Price
Price (score)
$280 Much cheaper.
+67%
$841
Age
Newest
15 Months 15 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
250 fps 276 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+10%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
300 fps 696 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+132%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
188 fps 355 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+89%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
232 fps 252 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+9%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
269 fps 636 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+136%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
175 fps 329 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+88%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The widely anticipated (albeit currently not widely available) prosumer AMD Radeon VII is finally available. It features a next generation Vega 20 GPU which is based on a 7nm manufacturing process, compared to 14nm in the first generation flagship: the RX Vega 64. The Radeon VII has a massive 16GB of expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which offers a decent degree of future proofing and also makes it a good choice for memory hungry applications, however most current games do not require more than the 8GB that comes with both NVIDIA's RTX 2080 and AMD’s RX Vega 64. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than the RX Vega 64 (3840 vs 4096) but clock speeds have been boosted up to 1800 MHz compared to 1546 MHz in the RX Vega 64, the net result is 13.8 TFLOPS single precision computations (versus 13.4 TFLOPS for the RX Vega 64). On the negative side, the Radeon VII is designed with three cooling fans which can get noisy and early software drivers are reported to be buggy. Whilst there is a modest 16% performance advantage over the RX Vega 64, initial benchmarks indicate that the Radeon VII has an effective speed which is 6% short of the similarly priced RTX 2080.  [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback