CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
240 EFps +2% 236 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
86 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+10%
78 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
99 EFps +1% 98 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
93 EFps 94 EFps +1%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
120 EFps +3% 117 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 138,862 user samples
92,223 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3)
Worst Bench: 67% Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 636
46,639 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 77% Gigabyte(1458 230C)
Poor: 77% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 636
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
73.8 % 85.6 % Faster effective speed.
+16%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
291 fps +2% 286 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
218 fps Faster multi rendering.
+19%
183 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
261 fps 328 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+26%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
320 fps 352 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+10%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
244 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+28%
191 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
280 fps 372 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+33%
Market Share
Based on 26,163,259 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.23 % Hugely higher market share.
+262%
0.34 %
Value
Value For Money
62.4 % Better value.
+17%
53.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
135 % More popular.
+16%
116 %
Price
Price (score)
$280 Cheaper.
+26%
$380
Age
Newest
13 Months Much more recent.
+58%
31 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
252 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+5%
239 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
302 fps 578 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+91%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
189 fps 302 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+60%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
233 fps +4% 223 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
268 fps 490 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+83%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
173 fps 288 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+66%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $84SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback