Real World Speed
Performance profile from 50,105 user samples
23,269 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 99% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Worst Bench: 77% Asus(1043 86A5) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 77% Great: 99%
SPEED RANK: 34th / 617
26,836 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 127% PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 73% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Poor: 73% Great: 127%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 617
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
91.7 % 110 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
270 fps 470 fps Much better texture detail.
+74%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
218 fps Faster multi rendering.
+20%
181 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
261 fps 318 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+22%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
176 fps 282 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+60%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
302 fps 579 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+92%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
244 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+27%
192 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
281 fps 372 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+32%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
190 fps 303 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+59%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
161 fps +2% 158 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
122 fps 123 fps +1%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
87 fps 99 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+13%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
78 fps 82 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+5%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
174 fps 191 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+10%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps 128 fps Better Overwatch fps.
+27%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85 fps 87 fps +3%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
102 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+16%
88 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
134 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+10%
123 fps
Market Share
Based on 18,300,876 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.4 % Much higher market share.
+57%
0.89 %
Value
Value For Money
112 % 123 % Slightly better value.
+10%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
82 % 89 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
Price
Price (score)
$270 Slightly cheaper.
+13%
$310
Age
Newest
4 Months Hugely more recent.
+83%
23 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
322 fps 350 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+9%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
254 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+6%
240 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
293 fps +1% 289 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
234 fps +4% 225 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $120Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $222Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $607SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback