Real World Speed
Performance profile from 70,316 user samples
36,880 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% MSI(1462 375A)
Worst Bench: 66% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3)
Poor: 66% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 621
33,436 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 96% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 59% Gigabyte(1458 230C)
Poor: 59% Great: 96%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
73.6 % 83.9 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+14%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
274 fps 478 fps Much better texture detail.
+74%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
220 fps Faster multi rendering.
+22%
181 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
263 fps 320 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+22%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
175 fps 283 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+62%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
303 fps 567 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+87%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
239 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+24%
192 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
280 fps 369 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+32%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
189 fps 303 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+60%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps +2% 157 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
134 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+10%
122 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps +5% 91 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps 76 fps +1%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
172 fps 186 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+8%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
112 fps 125 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
85 fps 86 fps +1%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
287 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+69%
170 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Better World of Warcraft fps.
+24%
80 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+6%
129 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,109,604 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.44 % Hugely higher market share.
+188%
0.5 %
Value
Value For Money
62.7 % 64.4 % +3%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
131 % Slightly more popular.
+15%
114 %
Price
Price (score)
$278 Slightly cheaper.
+10%
$309
Age
Newest
6 Months Much more recent.
+76%
25 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
324 fps 346 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+7%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
251 fps +5% 240 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
298 fps +2% 292 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
236 fps +4% 226 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $60
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $207
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback