Real World Speed
Performance profile from 897,093 user samples
225,719 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3)
Worst Bench: 69% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Poor: 69% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 59th / 665
671,374 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 56% Gigabyte(1458 366A)
Worst Bench: 45% Asus(1043 8508)
Poor: 45% Great: 56%
SPEED RANK: 88th / 665
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
76.1 % Much faster effective speed.
50.7 %
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
97.1 fps Much better lighting effects.
62.2 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
101 fps Much better reflection handling.
72.4 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
97.7 fps Much faster multi rendering.
68.1 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
89.8 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
62.8 fps
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
106 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
70.1 fps
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
137 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
97 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
105 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
73.4 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
95.5 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
70 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
156 Fps +1% 156 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
94 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
63 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
74 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
53 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
181 Fps Better LoL Fps.
156 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
110 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
97 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
78 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
61 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 Fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
48 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
263 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
189 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
147 Fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
121 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
93 Fps Much Better WoW Fps.
63 Fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
133 Fps Much Better WoT Fps.
97 Fps
Market Share
Based on 43,760,485 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.98 % 1.36 % Much higher market share.
Value For Money
64.4 % Hugely better value.
35.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
80 % More popular.
69 %
Price (score)
$280 Cheaper.
27 Months Much more recent.
81 Months
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
96.9 fps Much better peak texture detail.
70.4 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
81.5 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
60.4 fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
87.8 fps Much better texture detail.
62.7 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
74.8 fps Much faster complex splatting.
54.6 fps

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]


The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here[Jul '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $285Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $100G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback