CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
182 EFps 199 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+9%
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
63 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+26%
50 EFps
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
73 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+7%
68 EFps
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
70 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+15%
61 EFps
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
85 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+25%
68 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 303,951 user samples
21,109 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 59% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Poor: 59% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 621
282,842 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% MSI(1462 3418)
Worst Bench: 48% Gigabyte(1458 22F1)
Poor: 48% Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 53rd / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66 % Faster effective speed.
+21%
54.7 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
240 fps 284 fps Better texture detail.
+18%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps +1% 146 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
234 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+12%
208 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
170 fps Faster complex splatting.
+30%
131 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
266 fps 322 fps Better peak texture detail.
+21%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
163 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+5%
155 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
248 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+9%
227 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
183 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+32%
139 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,846,905 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.99 % 2.96 % Hugely higher market share.
+199%
Value
Value For Money
74.5 % 76.3 % +2%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
136 % More popular.
+16%
117 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 $170 Cheaper.
+19%
Age
Newest
7 Months Much more recent.
+77%
30 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
300 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+32%
227 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
233 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+22%
191 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
281 fps Much better lighting effects.
+38%
203 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
219 fps Better reflection handling.
+22%
179 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $185Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback