CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
232 EFps 240 EFps +3%
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
86 EFps 86 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
97 EFps 99 EFps +2%
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
93 EFps 93 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
116 EFps 120 EFps +3%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 77,277 user samples
7,268 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% MSI(1462 C758)
Worst Bench: 65% Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 65% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 630
70,009 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Worst Bench: 69% Asus(1043 86A7) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 630
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
69.5 % 74.4 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
278 fps 296 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+6%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
247 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+12%
220 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
234 fps 264 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+13%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
296 fps 323 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+9%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
256 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+8%
236 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
245 fps 279 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+14%
Market Share
Based on 23,625,431 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.98 % 1.58 % Much higher market share.
+61%
Value
Value For Money
68.7 % Slightly better value.
+7%
64.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
159 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
146 %
Price
Price (score)
$240 Slightly cheaper.
+12%
$274
Age
Newest
2 Months Much more recent.
+80%
10 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
232 fps 251 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+8%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
286 fps 302 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+6%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
181 fps 189 fps +4%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
218 fps 236 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+8%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
257 fps 273 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+6%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
172 fps 176 fps +2%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1660 Super has a launch price of just $230 USD with comparable performance to the $280 USD 1660 Ti. The 1660 Super has 14 Gbps GDDR6 (versus 12Gbps GDDR6 for the 1660 Ti and 8Gbps GDDR5 for the 1660). The 1660 range of cards sit in the sweet spot for many gamers because they offer superb 1080p EFps in popular titles and they are relatively hassle free in terms of noise, compatibility and stability. The 1660S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Shop prices will determine which 1660 series card represents the best value over time but at today's prices the 1660 Super effectively undercuts the 1660 Ti by $50 USD thus challenging the RX 590 in terms of overall value at 1080p. The next step up from the 1660S would be to the $325 RTX 2060[Oct '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback