CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
182 EFps 214 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+18%
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
63 EFps 73 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+16%
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
73 EFps 87 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+19%
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
70 EFps 79 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+13%
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
85 EFps 99 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+16%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 70,846 user samples
23,443 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 69% MSI(1462 3792)
Worst Bench: 61% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Poor: 61% Great: 69%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 622
47,403 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 67% Asus(1043 86A7) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 622
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66 % 73.8 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+12%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
239 fps 273 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+14%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 220 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+50%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
234 fps 263 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+12%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
170 fps 177 fps +4%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
265 fps 300 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+13%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
154 fps 234 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+52%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
247 fps 279 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+13%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
182 fps 190 fps +4%
Market Share
Based on 21,504,111 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.85 % 1.36 % Much higher market share.
+60%
Value
Value For Money
74.4 % Slightly better value.
+11%
67.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
143 % +2% 140 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 Cheaper.
+19%
$260
Age
Newest
7 Months Slightly more recent.
+12%
8 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
299 fps 322 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+8%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
231 fps 252 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
281 fps 300 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+7%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
218 fps 237 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+9%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback