CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
221 EFps 240 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+9%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
72 EFps 86 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+19%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
83 EFps 99 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+19%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps 93 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+18%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
101 EFps 120 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+19%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 278,747 user samples
113,865 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% Gigabyte(1458 3FC7)
Worst Bench: 64% Gigabyte(1458 3FCF) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 64% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 56th / 650
164,882 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3)
Worst Bench: 69% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Poor: 69% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 49th / 650
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
72.6 % 78.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
93.1 fps 98.6 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+6%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
70.1 fps 104 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+48%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
77.8 fps 87.6 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+13%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
101 fps 107 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+6%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
76.9 fps 114 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+48%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
83.3 fps 93.8 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+13%
Market Share
Based on 35,667,981 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.07 % 1.26 % Higher market share.
+18%
Value
Value For Money
74.8 % Better value.
+12%
66.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
138 % 149 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Price
Price (score)
$230 Cheaper.
+18%
$280
Age
Newest
20 Months +5% 21 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
90.9 fps 99.4 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
83.8 fps 95.6 fps Better peak texture detail.
+14%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
79.7 fps 82.6 fps +4%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
84 fps 90.8 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+8%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
74.5 fps 85 fps Better texture detail.
+14%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
71.7 fps 74.8 fps +4%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback