Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
221 EFps 240 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+9%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
72 EFps 86 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+19%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
83 EFps 99 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+19%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
79 EFps 93 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+18%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
101 EFps 120 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+19%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 549,355 user samples
230,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)
Poor: 62% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 105th / 713
318,562 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Poor: 70% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 95th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
68.3 % 76 % Faster effective speed.
+11%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
90.3 fps 96.9 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+7%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
90.8 fps 98.8 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+9%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
64.2 fps 96.9 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+51%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
78.4 fps 89.4 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+14%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
97.1 fps 104 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+7%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
121 fps 134 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+11%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
68.5 fps 103 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+50%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
82.7 fps 93.8 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+13%
Market Share
Based on 68,722,802 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.97 % Higher market share.
+28%
0.76 %
Value
Value For Money
77.5 % 126 % Much better value.
+63%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
76 % 82 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Price
Price (score)
$209 $143 Much cheaper.
+32%
Age
Newest
68 Months 68 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
84.8 fps 95.9 fps Better peak texture detail.
+13%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
74.6 fps 80.1 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+7%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
75.7 fps 87.6 fps Better texture detail.
+16%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
70 fps 75.7 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+8%

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback