Real World Speed
Performance profile from 57,422 user samples
18,368 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 61% MSI(1462 3792)
Poor: 61% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 621
39,054 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 67% Asus(1043 869F)
Poor: 67% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
66 % 73.8 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+12%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
240 fps 272 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+13%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 220 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+50%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
233 fps 265 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+14%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
171 fps 175 fps +2%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
264 fps 301 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+14%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
156 fps 241 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+54%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
246 fps 280 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+14%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
182 fps 191 fps +5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
127 fps 160 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+25%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
119 fps 134 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+12%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73 fps 95 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+30%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
70 fps 75 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+8%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
181 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+5%
172 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
103 fps 112 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60 fps 85 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+40%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
283 fps 287 fps +2%
Market Share
Based on 20,226,169 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.92 % 1.44 % Much higher market share.
+57%
Value
Value For Money
71.1 % Slightly better value.
+12%
63.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
142 % +3% 138 %
Price
Price (score)
$220 Cheaper.
+20%
$275
Age
Newest
6 Months Slightly more recent.
+14%
7 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
300 fps 321 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+7%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
232 fps 253 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
281 fps 300 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+7%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
218 fps 237 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+9%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback