Real World Speed
Performance profile from 211,892 user samples
174,556 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 117% MSI(1462 3730) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 84% HP(103C 8555) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 84% Great: 117%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 630
37,336 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 83% Acer(1025 1246) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 83% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 20th / 630
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
105 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
96.7 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
373 fps Better lighting effects.
+19%
314 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
354 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+88%
188 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
362 fps 377 fps +4%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
433 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+18%
367 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
392 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+100%
196 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
406 fps 426 fps +5%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
235 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+6%
223 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
147 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+21%
121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
104 Fps 104 Fps +0%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+15%
88 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
237 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+23%
194 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
124 Fps 127 Fps +3%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+19%
97 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
106 Fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+21%
88 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
281 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+39%
202 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
102 Fps Slightly Better WoW Fps.
+14%
89 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
164 Fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+31%
125 Fps
Market Share
Based on 23,623,088 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.62 % Hugely higher market share.
+363%
0.35 %
Value
Value For Money
62.3 % +3% 60.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
104 % 107 % +3%
Price
Price (score)
$400 $378 Slightly cheaper.
+5%
Age
Newest
15 Months Much more recent.
+48%
29 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
344 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+40%
246 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
466 fps 629 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+35%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
247 fps 310 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+26%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
307 fps Much better reflection handling.
+36%
226 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
399 fps 542 fps Much better texture detail.
+36%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
224 fps 296 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+32%
ADVERTISEMENT

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback