Real World Speed
Performance profile from 180,885 user samples
142,672 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% EVGA(3842 2173)
Worst Bench: 89% Gigabyte(1458 37AD)
Poor: 89% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 625
38,213 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 70% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 24th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
102 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+10%
92.7 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
410 fps 542 fps Much better texture detail.
+32%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
362 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+93%
188 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
373 fps +1% 370 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
226 fps 293 fps Faster complex splatting.
+30%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
470 fps 628 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+34%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
392 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+99%
197 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
408 fps 423 fps +4%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
249 fps 311 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+25%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
237 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+6%
223 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
147 fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+20%
122 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
103 fps 104 fps +1%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
99 fps Slightly Better GTAV Fps.
+13%
87 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
241 fps Better LoL Fps.
+28%
188 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
122 fps 128 fps +5%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
116 fps Better BF1 Fps.
+19%
97 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
105 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+18%
89 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
276 fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+29%
214 fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
96 fps Slightly Better WoW Fps.
+13%
85 fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
162 fps Better WoT Fps.
+29%
126 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,548,193 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.79 % Hugely higher market share.
+442%
0.33 %
Value
Value For Money
58 % Slightly better value.
+7%
54.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % 107 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
Price
Price (score)
$415 $405 +2%
Age
Newest
12 Months Much more recent.
+56%
27 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
434 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+17%
370 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
346 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+40%
247 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
388 fps Better lighting effects.
+21%
320 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
316 fps Much better reflection handling.
+36%
232 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $207Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback