Real World Speed
Performance profile from 23,732 user samples
11,331 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 146% Asus(1043 8671) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 100% Asus(1043 866D) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 100% Great: 146%
SPEED RANK: 8th / 599
12,401 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 136% Device(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 83% Device(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 83% Great: 136%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 599
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
133 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+11%
120 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
408 fps 528 fps Better texture detail.
+29%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
357 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+92%
186 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
377 fps +3% 366 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
232 fps 290 fps Faster complex splatting.
+25%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
475 fps 634 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+33%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
396 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+103%
195 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
416 fps 421 fps +1%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
253 fps 309 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+22%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
242 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+10%
219 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
116 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+34%
86 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
121 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+22%
99 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
118 fps 126 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+7%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
137 fps 149 fps Slightly Better Fortnite fps.
+8%
Market Share
Based on 13,739,888 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.99 % Hugely higher market share.
+154%
0.39 %
Value
Value For Money
104 % Better value.
+23%
84.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
71 % 77 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Price
Price (score)
$530 Slightly cheaper.
+15%
$620
Age
Newest
2 Months Hugely more recent.
+88%
17 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
444 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+21%
368 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
352 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+44%
245 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
390 fps Better lighting effects.
+29%
303 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
315 fps Much better reflection handling.
+38%
229 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $159Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $124SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $800SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback