Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 569,793 user samples
478,117 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Gigabyte(1458 37B6) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 93% MSI(1462 3732)
Poor: 93% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 713
91,676 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% AMD(1002 6B76)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
104 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
86.6 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
128 fps Better lighting effects.
+15%
111 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
119 fps Better reflection handling.
+10%
108 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
174 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+89%
92.3 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
125 fps 132 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+6%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
143 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+17%
122 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
170 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+49%
114 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
187 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+96%
95.4 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
136 fps 143 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+5%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
235 Fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+6%
223 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
147 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+21%
121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
104 Fps 104 Fps +0%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 Fps Better GTAV Fps.
+15%
88 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
237 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+23%
194 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
124 Fps 127 Fps +3%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps Better BF1 Fps.
+19%
97 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
106 Fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+21%
88 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
281 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+39%
202 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
102 Fps Better WoW Fps.
+14%
89 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
164 Fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+31%
125 Fps
Market Share
Based on 68,771,785 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.11 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,120%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
123 % Hugely better value.
+140%
51.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
67 % More popular.
+26%
53 %
Price
Price (score)
$200 Much cheaper.
+50%
$400
Age
Newest
73 Months More recent.
+16%
87 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
145 fps 197 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+36%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
113 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+44%
78.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
129 fps 178 fps Much better texture detail.
+38%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
105 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+39%
75.8 fps

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback