UserBenchmark: AMD RX Vega-64 vs Nvidia RTX 2070

GPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR GPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nvidia

BUY • $200

AMD

BUY • $400

BenchYourGPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 569,793 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

478,117 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 112% Gigabyte(1458 37B6) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 93% MSI(1462 3732)

Poor: 93% Great: 112%

SPEED RANK: 60^th / 714

91,676 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 94% AMD(1002 6B76)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 6B76)

Poor: 77% Great: 94%

SPEED RANK: 82^nd / 714


Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed		104 %	Faster effective speed. +20%		86.6 %


Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	128 fps	Better lighting effects. +15%	111 fps
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	119 fps	Better reflection handling. +10%	108 fps
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)	174 fps	Hugely faster multi rendering. +89%	92.3 fps
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)	125 fps		132 fps	Slightly faster NBody calculation. +6%


Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	143 fps	Better peak lighting effects. +17%	122 fps
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	170 fps	Much better peak reflection handling. +49%	114 fps
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)	187 fps	Hugely faster peak multi rendering. +96%	95.4 fps
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)	136 fps		143 fps	Slightly faster peak NBody calculation. +5%


CSGO Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	235 Fps	Slightly Better CSGO Fps. +6%	223 Fps
Fortnite Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	147 Fps	Better Fortnite Fps. +21%	121 Fps
PUBG Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	104 Fps		104 Fps	+0%
GTAV Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	101 Fps	Better GTAV Fps. +15%	88 Fps
LoL Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	237 Fps	Better LoL Fps. +23%	194 Fps
Overwatch Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	124 Fps		127 Fps	+3%
BF1 Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	115 Fps	Better BF1 Fps. +19%	97 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	106 Fps	Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps. +21%	88 Fps
Minecraft Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	281 Fps	Much Better Minecraft Fps. +39%	202 Fps
WoW Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	102 Fps	Better WoW Fps. +14%	89 Fps
WoT Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max	164 Fps	Much Better WoT Fps. +31%	125 Fps

Market Share

Based on 67,450,862 GPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	1.05 %	Insanely higher market share. +5,150%	0.02 %
Value Value For Money	123 %	Hugely better value. +140%	51.3 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	67 %	More popular. +26%	53 %
Price Price (score)	$200	Much cheaper. +50%	$400


Age Newest	66 Months	More recent. +18%	80 Months
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	145 fps		197 fps	Much better peak texture detail. +36%
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	113 fps	Much faster peak complex splatting. +44%	78.4 fps
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	129 fps		178 fps	Much better texture detail. +38%
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	105 fps	Much faster complex splatting. +39%	75.8 fps

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards. ^{[Oct '18 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here) ^{[Nov '19 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

What is the MRender GPU benchmark?

What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?

What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?

What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?

What is the GPU value for money rating?

What is the effective GPU speed index?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback