Today's hottest deals
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
285 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+9%
262 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
122 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+7%
114 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
154 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+8%
143 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
145 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+6%
137 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
171 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+8%
158 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,141,720 user samples
663,603 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% Asus(1043 8727) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 105% Dell(1028 C723) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 49th / 713
478,117 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Gigabyte(1458 37B6) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 93% MSI(1462 3732)
Poor: 93% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
115 % Faster effective speed.
+11%
104 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
150 fps Better lighting effects.
+17%
128 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
154 fps Better reflection handling.
+29%
119 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
182 fps +5% 174 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
129 fps +3% 125 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
164 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+15%
143 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
208 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+22%
170 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
196 fps +5% 187 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
137 fps +1% 136 fps
Market Share
Based on 68,776,627 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.32 % Higher market share.
+18%
1.12 %
Value
Value For Money
70.7 % 123 % Much better value.
+74%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
87 % More popular.
+30%
67 %
Price
Price (score)
$387 $200 Much cheaper.
+48%
Age
Newest
64 Months More recent.
+12%
73 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
169 fps Better peak texture detail.
+17%
145 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
122 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+8%
113 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
148 fps Better texture detail.
+15%
129 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
115 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+10%
105 fps

The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2070 in Nvidia’s line-up of ray-tracing high performance GPUs, yielding around a 10% performance improvement at the same $500 USD price point. The 2070 Super has been upgraded to use the same GPU die as in the RTX 2080, and now has 2560 CUDA cores, up from 2304 in the 2070. It has a base and boost clock speed of 1605 and 1770 MHz respectively and a 215 W power draw compared to the 185 W per the original 2070. The RTX 2070S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The launch of the RTX 2070 Super comes at an exciting time for those in the market for a new graphics card, who can also choose from AMD’s latest first generation RDNA RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. Some swift maneuvering on price by AMD prior to launch date means that the RX 5700 XT is currently $100 USD cheaper than the 2070 Super. An RTX 2060 Super has also been launched. Also, an RTX 2080 Super is set for launch in the near future which will replace the 2080 offering at the $700 price point. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback