COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
AMD
VS
Effective Speed 
+33%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 516,416 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
261,508 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 139% EVGA(3842 3183)
Worst Bench: 116% Asus(1043 8736) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 116% Great: 139%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 713
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		131 % Much faster effective speed.
+33% 		98.3 %
Average Score 
+38%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		176 fps Much better lighting effects.
+42% 		124 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		181 fps Much better reflection handling.
+30% 		139 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		197 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+67% 		118 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		156 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+11% 		140 fps
Overclocked Score 
+48%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		192 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+44% 		133 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		242 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+66% 		146 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		210 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+72% 		122 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		166 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+10% 		151 fps
Game FPS 
+17%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		251 Fps +4% 242 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		185 Fps Better Fortnite Fps.
+11% 		167 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		142 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+51% 		94 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max 		121 Fps +3% 117 Fps
Value & Sentiment 
+11%
Market Share
Based on 68,677,561 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.69 % Hugely higher market share.
+92% 		0.36 %
Value
Value For Money 		66.4 % 87.6 % Much better value.
+32%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		74 % More popular.
+25% 		59 %
Price
Price (score) 		$466 $266 Much cheaper.
+43%
Nice To Haves 
+10%
Age
Newest 		63 Months +2% 64 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		202 fps 229 fps Better peak texture detail.
+13%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		137 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+40% 		98.2 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		180 fps 205 fps Better texture detail.
+14%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		130 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+38% 		94.3 fps
Conclusion 
Average Bench 131%
Average Bench 98.3%

The high performance ray-tracing RTX 2080 Super follows the recent release of the 2060 Super and 2070 Super, from NVIDIA’s latest range of refreshed Turing RTX GPUs. The 2080 Super is a higher binned version of the original RTX 2080 which it replaces at the same price of $700 USD. In terms of specification changes between the two, the 2080 has 2944 CUDA cores, compared to 3072 in the 2080 Super, core and boost clocks have increased from 1515 MHz and 1710 MHz to 1650 MHz and 1815 MHz, respectively, memory bandwidth has increased from 14 Gbps to 15.5 Gbps and the TDP has increased from 215 W to 250 W. This translates to a roughly 10% effective speed advantage over the original 2080. The RTX 2080S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Competition in this price bracket is in the form of the AMD’s Radeon VII, over which, early benchmarks suggest, the 2080 Super commands a 15% effective speed advantage. The RTX 2080 Super however, is not a value champion and those seeking more bang for their buck may do well to consider Nvidia’s own $500 USD RTX 2070 Super (which has 17% lower effective speed). [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
261,508
254,908
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback