CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
280 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+22%
229 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps 110 EFps
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps 138 EFps
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
135 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+6%
127 EFps
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
133 EFps 157 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+18%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 95,906 user samples
33,366 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% Asus(1043 86FB) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 90% Asus(1043 870D) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 90% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 630
62,540 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 99% Sapphire(1DA2 E411)
Poor: 99% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 630
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
99.8 % 106 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
371 fps 392 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+6%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
362 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+51%
239 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
334 fps 401 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+20%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
406 fps 447 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+10%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
383 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+56%
246 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
358 fps 431 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+20%
Market Share
Based on 23,623,088 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.43 % 2.12 % Much higher market share.
+48%
Value
Value For Money
59.1 % 61.3 % +4%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
140 % Slightly more popular.
+15%
122 %
Price
Price (score)
$400 +2% $410
Age
Newest
6 Months 6 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
329 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+6%
309 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
449 fps 874 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+95%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
245 fps 378 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+54%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
307 fps +5% 293 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
401 fps 780 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+95%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
230 fps 362 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+57%
ADVERTISEMENT

Nvidia’s RTX 2060 Super GPU is a refreshed version of their RTX 2060 launched just 10 months prior. With this iteration, NVIDIA are hoping to contest AMD’s recent RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT with a better value proposition than compared to the 2060. The RTX 2060 Super uses the same GPU die as in the 2060, but has extra CUDA cores (increasing from 1920 to 2176) and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory (up from 6 GB), capable of delivering 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It has a has a TDP of 175 W, compared to 160 W in the 2060. The RTX 2060S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 15-20% increase in effective speed from the 2060 to 2060 Super costs around $50 on reference price tags. For now Nvidia will retain the "not-Super" RTX 2060 as the most affordable GPU in the ray-tracing 2000 series at $350 USD. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback