Real World Speed
Performance profile from 83,504 user samples
44,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 33% Asus(1043 04B0)
Poor: 33% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 625
38,956 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 72% MSI(1462 3681)
Poor: 72% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
43.3 % 84.5 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+95%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
225 fps 480 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+113%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
131 fps 181 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+38%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
159 fps 321 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+102%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
120 fps 284 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+137%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
264 fps 563 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+113%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps 192 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+39%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
182 fps 366 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+101%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps 304 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+141%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
139 fps 157 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
+13%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
83 fps 122 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+47%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
57 fps 91 fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+59%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 76 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+55%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
134 fps 186 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+39%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 fps 125 fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+42%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
49 fps 101 fps Hugely Better BF1 Fps.
+106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
48 fps 86 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+77%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
109 fps 170 fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+56%
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
50 fps 80 fps Much Better WoW Fps.
+62%
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
82 fps 129 fps Much Better WoT Fps.
+56%
Market Share
Based on 21,569,750 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.29 % 0.47 % Much higher market share.
+62%
Value
Value For Money
81.7 % Much better value.
+30%
62.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
90 % 112 % More popular.
+24%
Price
Price (score)
$126 Much cheaper.
+61%
$320
Age
Newest
39 Months 27 Months Much more recent.
+31%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
192 fps 347 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+81%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
173 fps 240 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+39%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
155 fps 297 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+92%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
163 fps 227 fps Much better reflection handling.
+39%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $209Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback