Real World Speed
Performance profile from 70,659 user samples
40,363 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 24% Sapphire(174B E344)
Worst Bench: 18% Sapphire(174B E348)
Poor: 18% Great: 24%
SPEED RANK: 125th / 621
30,296 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 64% Gigabyte(1458 230C)
Poor: 64% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 31st / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
21.5 % 84.1 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+292%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
102 fps 481 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+372%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
63.2 fps 181 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+186%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
76.4 fps 322 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+321%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
77.2 fps 284 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+268%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
118 fps 576 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+388%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
65.5 fps 191 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+192%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
85.7 fps 369 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+331%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
80.4 fps 304 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+278%
CSGO
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
116 fps 157 fps Much Better CSGO fps.
+35%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
50 fps 122 fps Hugely Better Fortnite fps.
+146%
GTAV
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
40 fps 76 fps Hugely Better GTAV fps.
+90%
LoL
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
112 fps 186 fps Much Better LoL fps.
+66%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
59 fps 125 fps Hugely Better Overwatch fps.
+111%
BF1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
43 fps 101 fps Hugely Better BF1 fps.
+136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
32 fps 86 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+171%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
97 fps 170 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+75%
WoT
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
46 fps 129 fps Hugely Better WoT fps.
+180%
Market Share
Based on 20,861,582 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.21 % 0.55 % Hugely higher market share.
+162%
Value
Value For Money
48.5 % 65.3 % Much better value.
+35%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
81 % 109 % Much more popular.
+35%
Price
Price (score)
$105 Much cheaper.
+66%
$305
Age
Newest
38 Months 26 Months Much more recent.
+32%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
88.3 fps 343 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+288%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
84.1 fps 239 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+184%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
75.8 fps 292 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+285%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
79.6 fps 225 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+183%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 460 is the third Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year, it follows the 470 and 480). The Polaris 11 GPU which drives the RX 460 is around 50% less powerful than the Polaris 10 GPU used by both the RX 480 and RX 470. Looking at the provisional average benchmarks (we only four samples of the RX 460 at this time) of the RX 460 and RX 480 shows that the performance gap of 50% percent is in line with the specs. The RX 460 is available with custom coolers from launch and it comes in both 2GB and 4GB varieties. With list prices starting from $120 for the 2GB variant the RX 460 offers decent value for money at the lower end of the graphics card spectrum. The 4GB version is somewhat poor value for money at the $150 price point since an RX 480 is only an additional $50 for double the performance. See the current value for money leaders here.  [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 Bios into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. This would be great news if the RX 56 were available at its MSRP of $399 as it would then be both cheaper and faster than a GTX 1070, but current market prices for the RX Vega 56 are closer to $550. The GPU market is still unbalanced (AMD GPUs in particular) as a result of the ongoing Ethereum mining frenzy which has depleted global GPU inventory to the lowest levels in recent memory. [Oct '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback