CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
229 EFps 232 EFps +1%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+28%
86 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+42%
97 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
127 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+37%
93 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
157 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+35%
116 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 685,882 user samples
414,469 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% Gigabyte(1458 2316) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 95% ASRock(1849 5101) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 95% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 34th / 667
271,413 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 75% Asus(1043 873A)
Worst Bench: 65% Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 65% Great: 75%
SPEED RANK: 65th / 667
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
104 % Much faster effective speed.
+48%
70.8 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
128 fps Much better lighting effects.
+42%
90.4 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
141 fps Much better reflection handling.
+51%
93.1 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
116 fps +4% 112 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
135 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+70%
79.5 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
139 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+43%
97.2 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
148 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+17%
127 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
121 fps 122 fps +1%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
145 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+71%
84.7 fps
Market Share
Based on 46,957,454 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.99 % 1.6 % Much higher market share.
+62%
Value
Value For Money
61.9 % 69.9 % Better value.
+13%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
75 % 94 % More popular.
+25%
Price
Price (score)
$400 $240 Much cheaper.
+40%
Age
Newest
27 Months 23 Months More recent.
+15%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
228 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+146%
92.7 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
98.8 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+28%
77 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
199 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+140%
82.8 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
94.9 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+33%
71.4 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Super has a launch price of just $230 USD with comparable performance to the $280 USD 1660 Ti. The 1660 Super has 14 Gbps GDDR6 (versus 12Gbps GDDR6 for the 1660 Ti and 8Gbps GDDR5 for the 1660). The 1660 range of cards sit in the sweet spot for many gamers because they offer superb 1080p EFps in popular titles and they are relatively hassle free in terms of noise, compatibility and stability. The 1660S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Shop prices will determine which 1660 series card represents the best value over time but at today's prices the 1660 Super effectively undercuts the 1660 Ti by $50 USD thus challenging the RX 590 in terms of overall value at 1080p. The next step up from the 1660S would be to the $325 RTX 2060[Oct '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $245Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback