COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD
Nvidia
VS
▲ 8215,434 ▼

Release date: Q1 2019.

Game EFps  
+26%
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max 		229 EFps 240 EFps +5%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		110 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+28% 		86 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		138 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+39% 		99 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max 		127 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+37% 		93 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		157 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+31% 		120 EFps
Effective Speed 
+29%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 573,470 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 713
318,562 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Poor: 70% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 95th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		98.3 % Faster effective speed.
+29% 		76 %
Average Score 
+37%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		124 fps Better lighting effects.
+28% 		96.9 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		139 fps Much better reflection handling.
+41% 		98.8 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		118 fps Faster multi rendering.
+22% 		96.9 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		140 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+57% 		89.4 fps
Overclocked Score 
+29%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		133 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+28% 		104 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		146 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9% 		134 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		122 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+18% 		103 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		151 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+61% 		93.8 fps
Value & Sentiment 
+79%
Market Share
Based on 68,761,960 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.32 % 0.92 % Hugely higher market share.
+188%
Value
Value For Money 		87.6 % 126 % Much better value.
+44%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		59 % 82 % Much more popular.
+39%
Price
Price (score) 		$266 $143 Much cheaper.
+46%
Nice To Haves 
+65%
Age
Newest 		64 Months Slightly more recent.
+6% 		68 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		229 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+139% 		95.9 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		98.2 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+23% 		80.1 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		205 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+134% 		87.6 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		94.3 fps Faster complex splatting.
+25% 		75.7 fps
Conclusion 
Average Bench 98.3%
Average Bench 76%

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
254,908
318,562
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback