COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD
Nvidia
VS
▲ 7610,359 ▼

Release date: Q1 2019.

Game EFps  
+48%
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max 		229 EFps +4% 221 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		110 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+53% 		72 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		138 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+66% 		83 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max 		127 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+61% 		79 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		157 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+55% 		101 EFps
Effective Speed 
+44%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 485,701 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
254,908 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 05AD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 713
230,793 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% Asus(1043 86BB)
Poor: 62% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 105th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		98.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+44% 		68.3 %
Average Score 
+63%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		124 fps Much better lighting effects.
+37% 		90.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		139 fps Much better reflection handling.
+53% 		90.8 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		118 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+84% 		64.2 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		140 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+79% 		78.4 fps
Overclocked Score 
+55%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		133 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+37% 		97.1 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		146 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+21% 		121 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		122 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+78% 		68.5 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		151 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+83% 		82.7 fps
Value & Sentiment 
+42%
Market Share
Based on 68,761,859 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.32 % 0.74 % Hugely higher market share.
+131%
Value
Value For Money 		87.6 % Better value.
+13% 		77.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		59 % 76 % More popular.
+29%
Price
Price (score) 		$266 $209 Cheaper.
+21%
Nice To Haves 
+83%
Age
Newest 		64 Months Slightly more recent.
+6% 		68 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		229 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+170% 		84.8 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		98.2 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+32% 		74.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		205 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+171% 		75.7 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		94.3 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+35% 		70 fps
Conclusion 
Average Bench 98.3%
Average Bench 68.3%

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
254,908
230,793
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback