Real World Speed
Performance profile from 324,110 user samples
5,548 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 293% XFX(1EAE 7901) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 216% PowerColor(148C 2422) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 216% Great: 293%
SPEED RANK: 4th / 714
318,562 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Poor: 70% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 95th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
257 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+238%
76 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
327 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+237%
96.9 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
435 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+340%
98.8 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
519 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+436%
96.9 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
303 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+239%
89.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
392 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+277%
104 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
520 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+288%
134 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
578 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+461%
103 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
335 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+257%
93.8 fps
Market Share
Based on 67,477,501 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.26 % 0.94 % Hugely higher market share.
+262%
Value
Value For Money
60.9 % 126 % Hugely better value.
+107%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
58 % 82 % Much more popular.
+41%
Price
Price (score)
$1,000 $143 Hugely cheaper.
+86%
Age
Newest
16 Months Much more recent.
+74%
62 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
848 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+784%
95.9 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
502 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+527%
80.1 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
761 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+769%
87.6 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
460 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+508%
75.7 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s new 7900 series GPUs received a lot of pre-launch hype. There were claims of 50-70% performance improvements over the previous flagship. Our benchmarks show that the 7900-XTX leads the 6950-XT by around 30%. AMD overhype their product launches because it is effective at getting first-time buyers to pay over MRSP. After an initial burst in sales, prices often drop rapidly, as with the 6900 XT and the recently launched Zen 4 7950X, which are now both 30% cheaper. AMD’s domination of social media platforms has historically resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products, those users will be very hard, if not impossible for AMD to win back. If this trend continues, semiconductors may become a secondary business line for AMD, who appear more focused on developing “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers and media outlets. Based on the volume of social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Be wary of sponsored reviews (golden samples+cherry picked games) that showcase the wins and gloss over the losses whilst conveniently ignoring frame drops. Despite steady price cuts, an increasing number of seasoned gamers simply have no interest in buying AMD products. They know from bitter experience that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. Most gamers, who are better off playing at 1080p, will do well to wait for Nvidia’s upcoming 4060/4070 series cards (est. early 2023). Even brand fans that wish to be in AMD’s “2%” club, will find better deals after the launch hype settles. Shoppers should avoid AMD’s reference design as many users are reporting thermal issues. [Dec '22 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback