CSGO 9400F
Dust 2 1080p Max
152 EFps 214 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+41%
GTAV 9400F
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
37 EFps 73 EFps Hugely Better GTAV EFps.
+97%
Overwatch 9400F
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
42 EFps 87 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+107%
PUBG 9400F
M249 Training 1080p Max
37 EFps 79 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+114%
Fortnite 9400F
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
43 EFps 99 EFps Hugely Better Fortnite EFps.
+130%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 496,732 user samples
449,329 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 34% MSI(1462 3351)
Worst Bench: 28% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 28% Great: 34%
SPEED RANK: 94th / 622
47,403 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 78% EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 67% Asus(1043 86A7) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 67% Great: 78%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 622
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
30.7 % 73.8 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+140%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
121 fps 273 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+126%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
79.8 fps 220 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+176%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
117 fps 263 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+125%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
81.6 fps 177 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+117%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
134 fps 300 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+124%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
83.1 fps 234 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+182%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
128 fps 279 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+118%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
88.1 fps 190 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+116%
Market Share
Based on 21,503,643 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3.29 % Hugely higher market share.
+142%
1.36 %
Value
Value For Money
46.9 % 67.2 % Much better value.
+43%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
125 % 139 % Slightly more popular.
+11%
Price
Price (score)
$155 Much cheaper.
+40%
$260
Age
Newest
36 Months 8 Months Much more recent.
+78%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
139 fps 322 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+132%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
85.1 fps 252 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+196%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
121 fps 300 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+148%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
80.1 fps 237 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+196%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1050 Ti 4GB is Nvidia’s latest Pascal based GPU. The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) found on the 3GB GTX 1060. Comparing userbenchmarks for the 1050 Ti and 3GB 1060 shows that the 1050 Ti is falling a little short of our expectations but we only have one benchmark for the 1050 Ti so the average score will probably improve as we gather more samples. The list price for the 1050 Ti is $139 which is between AMDs $185 RX 470 and $100 RX 460. Comparing performance between the RX 470 vs GTX 1050 Ti and RX 460 vs GTX 1050 Ti shows that the 1050 Ti sits roughly in the middle for both price and performance. [Oct '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback