Real World Speed
Performance profile from 413,301 user samples
394,933 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 34% Asus(1043 85D1)
Worst Bench: 28% MSI(1462 8C96)
Poor: 28% Great: 34%
SPEED RANK: 92nd / 621
18,368 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8)
Worst Bench: 61% MSI(1462 3792)
Poor: 61% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
30.6 % 66 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+116%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
120 fps 240 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+100%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
79.7 fps 147 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+84%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
116 fps 233 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+101%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
82 fps 171 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+109%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
134 fps 264 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+97%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
83.7 fps 156 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+86%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
129 fps 246 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+91%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
88.5 fps 182 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+106%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
120 fps 127 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+6%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76 fps 119 fps Much Better Fortnite fps.
+56%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
47 fps 73 fps Much Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+56%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
46 fps 70 fps Much Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+52%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
135 fps 181 fps Much Better League of Legends fps.
+35%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps 103 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
39 fps 60 fps Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+56%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
169 fps 283 fps Much Better Minecraft fps.
+67%
Market Share
Based on 20,220,357 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3.07 % Hugely higher market share.
+230%
0.93 %
Value
Value For Money
46.8 % 71.1 % Much better value.
+52%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
107 % 141 % Much more popular.
+32%
Price
Price (score)
$155 Cheaper.
+30%
$220
Age
Newest
34 Months 6 Months Hugely more recent.
+82%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
139 fps 300 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+116%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
85.9 fps 232 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+170%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
120 fps 281 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+134%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
80 fps 218 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+172%
ADVERTISEMENT

The GTX 1050 Ti 4GB is Nvidia’s latest Pascal based GPU. The 1050 Ti has a TDP of 75 Watts and is based on a new 14nm GP107 processing core which has approximately 66% of the key resources (CUDA cores, texture units, memory bandwidth and transistor count etc.) found on the 3GB GTX 1060. Comparing userbenchmarks for the 1050 Ti and 3GB 1060 shows that the 1050 Ti is falling a little short of our expectations but we only have one benchmark for the 1050 Ti so the average score will probably improve as we gather more samples. The list price for the 1050 Ti is $139 which is between AMDs $185 RX 470 and $100 RX 460. Comparing performance between the RX 470 vs GTX 1050 Ti and RX 460 vs GTX 1050 Ti shows that the 1050 Ti sits roughly in the middle for both price and performance. [Oct '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback