Real World Speed
Performance profile from 563,574 user samples
528,238 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 111% Nvidia(10DE 119E)
Worst Bench: 81% EVGA(3842 5184) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 81% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 621
35,336 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 75% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 75% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 24th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
100 % Slightly faster effective speed.
93.4 %
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
407 fps 548 fps Much better texture detail.
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
237 fps Faster multi rendering.
188 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
395 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
374 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
247 fps 295 fps Faster complex splatting.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
461 fps 630 fps Much better peak texture detail.
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
257 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
197 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
440 fps +3% 429 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
271 fps 310 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
199 fps 223 fps Slightly Better CSGO fps.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
140 fps Better Fortnite fps.
122 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
96 fps 104 fps Slightly Better PUBG fps.
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93 fps Slightly Better GTAV fps.
87 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
217 fps Better LoL fps.
188 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
124 fps 128 fps +3%
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
111 fps Slightly Better BF1 fps.
97 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
89 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
245 fps Slightly Better Minecraft fps.
214 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps Slightly Better WoW fps.
85 fps
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
133 fps Slightly Better WoT fps.
126 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,846,604 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.87 % Hugely higher market share.
0.38 %
Value For Money
44.9 % +1% 44.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
92 % 106 % More popular.
Price (score)
$528 $500 Slightly cheaper.
40 Months 26 Months Much more recent.
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
449 fps Better peak lighting effects.
373 fps
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
408 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
245 fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
394 fps Better lighting effects.
322 fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
370 fps Much better reflection handling.
234 fps

The GTX 1080 is Nvidia’s new flagship graphics card. It features the new 16 nm (down from 28 nm) Pascal architecture. This is the first die shrink since the release of the GTX 680 at which time the manufacturing process shrunk from 40 nm down to 28 nm. In terms of typical 3D gaming performance the 1080 is around 30% faster than the GTX 980 Ti and it manages to deliver the additional performance with a TDP of just 180 Watts which is 70 Watts less than the 980 Ti. The new Pascal architecture delivers a satisfying jump in performance over Maxwell and the GTX 1080 is now the fastest single GPU available. Over the coming months older generation cards will likely see significant price drops as the better value for money 1070, 1060 and 1050 cards slowly replace their predecessors. [May '16 GPUPro]


The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $185Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback